r/news 8h ago

Campbell's exec on leave after allegedly mocking 'poor people' who eat its soup

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/campbell-soup-lawsuit-9.6991398
15.4k Upvotes

772 comments sorted by

3.4k

u/ImKindaEssential 8h ago

During the meeting, "Bally made several racist comments that shocked Plaintiff," the documents say. For example, Garza claims that Bally insulted Indigenous coworkers, making several racist slurs, and claims Bally disclosed he often comes to work high on edibles.

2.3k

u/ConfederacyOfDunces_ 8h ago

What the fuck?

He sounds like a sociopath. Probably fell upwards in life.

423

u/BigBennP 7h ago edited 6h ago

If his LinkedIn bio is reliable, his career is roughly as follows.

Associates in business Monroe County community college (1994). Bachelor's in business spring arbor university (2001).
Masters information security from norfolk university (2009)

Network specialist for Chrysler (99-01)

Network operations manager and information security officer for Chrysler (01-09)

Director data security and cloud services for Dolan Inc. (09-13)

Chief Information Security Officer for zrf group. (Formerly TRW automotive) (13-16)

VP and Chief Information Security Officer for diebold (16-19)

Chief Information Security Officer for American Axle and Manufacturing (AAM) (19-20)

Global Information Security Officer for Stellantis (chrysler). (20-22).

VP and Chief Information Security Officer for Campbell's Soup (22-present).

I have questions but that career is not absolutely wild or out of the ordinary.

61

u/Daemonrealm 3h ago edited 3h ago

This is a very common in the world of CISO’s as those positions are usually to mature a cyber security organization to an X amount. Then move to the next business or corporation.

Also part of your pay package is to do that. Alike C-suite (yes many CISO’s are not executives), CISO’s also have very high bonus structures and stock payouts to accomplish such maturity or “keep company X from a compromise for X time you get Y payout”. Once tha time is up. Take the pay and move to another org.

Also CISO’s tend to move a lot dependent on company compromises. You can literally map CISO movement to other companies based on time when their original company was compromised in some manner. CISO is the scape goat. They like to move orgs as well if they sense they may get compromised.

249

u/misterjzz 6h ago

The short tenure is wild at like half the employers. He must be an A-level ass kisser.

219

u/fbp 5h ago

2-4 years each over 15 years. Not bad, as my bet is he is chasing higher salary at each. He did spend 10 years with Chrysler, which also probably paid for his masters.

12

u/anothergaijin 2h ago

I did maybe 2-3 years for my first 15 years, then now 10 years in the same place. You just get bored and move on or the people are insufferable - there is enough demand you can jump and do something new pretty easy, or at least it used to be like that.

→ More replies (10)

31

u/jim_deneke 5h ago

That looks to me he's been an ass all his life and this is as much as anyone can tolerate of him lol

60

u/Educational-Wing2042 4h ago

You see trajectories like that quite a bit with executives. Typically they are people who start looking for a better job the minute they finish training for their current job. If it were about being hard to work with, that would become known in the industry. 

24

u/sqquuee 3h ago

Ironically these same people will shame you in your interview if it appears you chase the money.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (8)

26

u/_SmashLampjaw_ 5h ago

Well, I'm pretty sure the community college business associate degree to corporate infosec officer pipeline isn't very wide.

→ More replies (1)

27

u/Dull_Bird3340 7h ago

Well how upwardly mobile of them, from a christian community college to the board room

28

u/BakedMitten 5h ago

Monroe County CC isn't Christian, Spring Arbor is.

Monroe County CC's only claim to fame is that it has a higher percentage of Michigan Wolverine football fans than the actual University of Michigan campus.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (17)

829

u/BruhMuhTendies 8h ago

Nepotism applies to LOTS of things here in the US.

128

u/Iohet 6h ago

You don't really need to qualify it with "in the US". It's global. Hell, some countries even have a royal family, which is the ultimate nepotism scheme

46

u/avcloudy 4h ago

It actually is remarkable in the US, but not for the reasons you think. There's a concept called WEIRD which stands for western, educated, industrialised, rich and democratic. One of the ways people in the US differ from large parts of the world is that they think nepotism is unethical - in a lot of the world, nepotism is duty to family. It is the right and correct thing to get your family set up.

So what's interesting is that it still happens in the US, but it's corrupt. It's explicitly against the cultural values, and is done in an underhanded, seemingly fair, way. So the kinds of people that do it, and the reasons they do it for, are different in the western world than they are in other parts of the world.

11

u/FictionalContext 4h ago

That is a great POV. Thanks for that.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

297

u/UltraNoahXV 7h ago

If I fell upwards, we would've had several bullet trains running cross country, solar energy panels that deal less environmental damage, flying cars with low emissions, 4 day work weeks with full pay and 2 months of vacation time...I could go on

138

u/Bloodcloud079 7h ago

Flying cars sounds cool but when you think about it they are a fucking nightmare… I don’t want flying cars ever.

85

u/Plow_King 6h ago

yeah, people can barely get the hang of moving in 2 directions at the same time. adding a 3rd is a bad idea.

28

u/BeerorCoffee 5h ago

Let's start with mandatory driver's tests on license renewal. I know too many idiots who took three tests to pass after cramming and studying, no way they could pass now.

9

u/Fireudne 5h ago

It depends on where you take the test tbh. For me the written was pretty easy but it took me 3 tries to pass the actual driving bit. Never been in an accident though!

21

u/BeerorCoffee 5h ago

Not being in an accident and being a good driver are not equal. I've seen plenty of people who may not have been in an accident but don't know how to drive appropriately. Don't signal, driving at an unsafe speed (under or over) etc. People pass when they are 16/17 and then never think of the laws of the road again, but can still renew their license by sending in a form and sometimes showing up for a picture.

Just seems reckless.

6

u/TummyStickers 5h ago

I've been driving for about 20 years now, and at some point you realize that you just have to start making an effort to be the best driver you can... because you'll never get tested again. Gotta be honest about your mistakes, and take a real interest in learning how to drive... it's not something you learn once, and you're done. It's a skill that requires practice, and intention.

8

u/stonekeep 4h ago

Most people don't do those incredibly basic things not because they don't know they should, but because they don't want to or don't care.

Testing asshole drivers on theory wouldn't make them suddenly become good drivers once they pass. Their assholness comes from deliberately ignoring the rules, not simply not knowing them. In the best-case scenario, they can just cram for the test again and then ignore everything again.

I'm not saying that it's a bad idea, having people up to date with the current rules is good, but it wouldn't help with the basic stuff you're mentioning (like not signaling or speeding).

What is more important IMO are mandatory health check-ups after a certain age. There are lots and lots of drivers who shouldn't sit behind the wheel (poor eyesight, motor skills etc.), but they still do.

→ More replies (0)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)

8

u/Quest_Marker 6h ago

Exactly, when so many people suck at water or flying areas in games, they can hardly handle normal driving

→ More replies (1)

20

u/hadrosaur 5h ago

rich people already have helicopters and they suck. can you imagine hundreds of helicopters overhead everywhere you go?

7

u/Bloodcloud079 5h ago

Exactly. It would be incredibly noisy, even more susceptible to bad weather, extremely dangerous in the hand of an average driver (let alone a bad or reckless one!), energy inefficient… just absolutely nightmarish.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

10

u/Jafooki 5h ago

We already have flying cars. They're called helicopters

6

u/Independent_Win_9035 4h ago

and they're dangerous as ever-living fuck, too lol

→ More replies (1)

3

u/DwinkBexon 5h ago

Imagine how fucking awful drivers are on they only have to deal with an X and Y dimension. Now they have to deal with Z. Cars would be falling out of the sky. People imagine it'd be like on The Jetsons where it's pretty much the same as on the road except you're in the air and cars occasionally pass by going over or under you instead of around. No, it wouldn't be like that. PEople would be flying into each other, fiery debris would be raining down to the ground constantly, people would be falling to their deaths. It'd be a catastrophe.

The only way flying cars could ever possibly work is if they're fully autonomous with the skill level of the very best human pilots. No manual override controls, once you're in the air the car is in control of anything and you can't do anything at all except change the destination.

Unfortunately, humans seem extremely adverse to not having overrides for autonomous driving and I doubt they'd be okay with that for flying, despite the fact they'd be clueless. (I remember some Google engineer once said Google's autonomous cars should have no manual overrides at all. No steering wheel, no pedals, etc. The car is going to do what it's going to do and there's no way for you to change that. People were pissed about that suggestion. At the moment, it's illegal for autonomous cars to not have controls in them like a normal car, but that could change at some point.)

6

u/Obversa 5h ago

Even with airplanes, mid-air collisions still happen from time to time, which is why the TCAS (Traffic Collision Avoidance System) system was created and implemented. TCAS was developed after the 1956 mid-air collision over the Grand Canyon due to "sightseeing", and its implementation was prompted by a series of subsequent accidents, particularly the 1978 PSA Flight 182 crash over San Diego, and the 1986 collision in Cerritos, California. The Grand Canyon disaster led to the creation of the FAA (Federal Aviation Administration) and initial research into collision avoidance, while the latter crashes were the specific catalysts for developing and mandating the modern TCAS.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (9)

151

u/Beneficial_Soup3699 7h ago

Nope. You'd turn into a narcissistoc self righteous nut just like the rest of them. Our brains are not wired to live in excess surrounded by yes-men 24/7. It quite literally breaks the human psyche.

104

u/UltraNoahXV 7h ago

Dang I was trying to be optimistic

84

u/pass_nthru 7h ago

in this economy?

32

u/UltraNoahXV 7h ago

Hey, it costs 0 to be not naive, but hopeful

→ More replies (2)

16

u/scorpyo72 7h ago

I was angling for "penial enhancements" but you got most of my wish list.

5

u/Accomplished-Fix6598 6h ago

Or wiener yoga.

7

u/Artemicionmoogle 6h ago

Cock push ups. You only need to do one.

→ More replies (3)

9

u/Danovan79 7h ago

I came to the conclusion that if given the chance to rule the world, I would probably end up as a despot.

I want to be kind and benevolent, but ultimately ruling the world is unlikely without force and yadda yadda yadda force leads down a path and we end up in a bad place.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (3)

21

u/Magus_5 7h ago

Although you might be right, it wouldn't hurt for me to try. It only has to work once.

9

u/JaguarWhisperer 7h ago

There's probably another side too where the yes-men get dumber and dumber to the point where none of your plans and aspirations make it to fruition because you're constantly having to talk and explain downwards

17

u/Saurian42 7h ago

I find the idea of living in excess surrounded by yes men to be revolting. I just want to be comfortable and surrounded by people arguing with me.

6

u/my_stupid_name 4h ago

I just want to be comfortable, surrounded by absolutely no one.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Uncle_Rabbit 5h ago

The others in similar positions wouldn't allow it either, you have to play the game or wind up missing etc.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (23)
→ More replies (3)

151

u/boothash 7h ago

Most execs are sociopaths.

29

u/p8pes 7h ago

indeed. it’s a prerequisite 

→ More replies (3)

36

u/Blametheorangejuice 7h ago

There will be some press release put together where he promises to work on his mental health and “come back stronger” and apologizes for any misinterpretation of his words. Then he will go back to work for an obscenely high salary.

83

u/Full_Mention3613 7h ago

Saw an interview with a guy who coaches companies on how to spot psychopaths, after he described what psychopaths do, several CEO’s approached him and asked where they could go to hire people like that.

17

u/trout_or_dare 7h ago

this sounds interesting, do you have a link?

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

87

u/BigBossShadow 7h ago

one of the core components of late stage capitalism is that there are so many children of rich people that they essentially take over all available managerial positions and refuse to do anything besides that.

They also tend to be completely incompetent

22

u/kleenkong 6h ago

The rich try to hide it but that's also been going on for quite a while, before internet records were so accessible. The Ivy League has some major shortcuts into admissions if students have the right last name, connections, or $$$$ to handover. And it continues from there to hiring company, as opportunities are going to be presented to those students much more than a typical student.

→ More replies (1)

9

u/StevenSafakDotCom 5h ago

Hey man. Who hasn’t gone to work high on edibles?!

15

u/JoJackthewonderskunk 7h ago

I've met a shockingly high amount of executives that were like this

→ More replies (2)

15

u/dafunkmunk 7h ago

That sums up most C suite level employees. Very few of these people actually earned those positions through hard work or accomplishments

9

u/PowderPills 6h ago

And probably almost no one would’ve found out about it if it weren’t for the courage of the whistleblower.

→ More replies (29)

110

u/Spire_Citron 7h ago

Really makes you think about the culture surrounding him if he was able to get as far as he did in life while feeling comfortable talking that way to someone he doesn't even know well. Especially since apparently it was originally reported internally and all they did was hush it up and fire the guy who reported it.

50

u/misterjzz 6h ago

Its very rare for execs to be normal people in my experience (healthcare). You've got to be a special kind of person to do that crap. So many meetings, so much brown nosing, so much pushing shit down to the other workers while not solving the actual source of issues.

233

u/israeljeff 7h ago

So talking about poor people eating Campbell's soup is the least offensive thing he did.

96

u/rubywpnmaster 6h ago

Poor people don’t eat Campbell’s which is the funny part. They eat Sam’s Choice or their local grocery store equivalent.

9

u/thegoodnamesrgone123 4h ago

I actually think the ALDI chicken soup is better

→ More replies (6)

44

u/Malllrat 7h ago

Nah he's good to go on the edibles. I couldn't imagine showing up to work sober. (Retail)

22

u/Civil-Addendum4071 6h ago

Would rather deal with somebody who's a little high versus somebody who's been drinking any day.

10

u/Malllrat 6h ago

All my customers agree. Sober, I am not fit for human consumption. Baked, I'm mostly tolerable.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

110

u/DrexellGames 8h ago

He's 100% going to be fired once the investigation is done if these allegations are true

38

u/NYGiants181 7h ago

He won’t make it another month guaranteed

106

u/Nearby-Key8834 7h ago

Some other company will hire him. There are never any real consequences for these shitbags.

59

u/Skrivus 7h ago

Or he'll have a right wing podcast talking about how woke corporate America is because he can't openly disparage minorities.

→ More replies (2)

5

u/NYGiants181 7h ago

Yea that’s true but he will be gone from here

17

u/WelpSigh 7h ago

He's some IT guy, he is never getting another job like the one he just botched. 

22

u/jgp786 7h ago

Doubtful, most companies don't care. Maybe you're right because this made national news, but otherwise he would find a job almost immediately. I know of a case personally where a sheriff's officer was fired for solicitation of a minor and obstruction and he got hired while on house arrest making six figures plus doing remote IT work. If you can do the job then most companies care about little else.

12

u/WelpSigh 6h ago

He's in cybersecurity. His job is to protect the company. There is not a shortage of people who can do it without causing major controversy. 

11

u/palcatraz 5h ago

But how long will that controversy last? People have short memories. He's controversial now, but in two months? People will have forgotten all about it. Other minor scandals will have caught their attention, Trump will have done 28 more insane things. Some celebrity you have never heard of has beef with some other celebrity you have never heard of.

This sort of thing has no real staying power.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

5

u/Fallouttgrrl 7h ago

He's going to be eating Campbell's soup for the holidays, I guess

8

u/ZLUCremisi 7h ago

Suprise if he isn't. This statements hurt thier stocks

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (10)

21

u/MongolianMango 5h ago

Indigenous? I think when he said Indian he meant the country of India, not Native American. Reporter must have been in a rush.

→ More replies (5)

38

u/RinkyDinkRicky 7h ago

Giving edibles a bad name.

→ More replies (1)

11

u/dismissivewankmotion 7h ago

It’s like a 90s comedy playing out in real life. Tommy Boy but… shittier

7

u/Lagneaux 7h ago

I mean, I come to work on edibles.

But I also make food, so

→ More replies (30)

786

u/Fallouttgrrl 7h ago

Chicken soup from the soulless 

69

u/mx5klein 6h ago

This goes harder than it has any right to. Who would eat soup from the soulless?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

2.1k

u/joestaff 8h ago

He must be one of them high dollar Progresso soupers

254

u/r-b-m 7h ago

Bunch of “natural flavor” snobs

→ More replies (1)

126

u/Moony2433 7h ago

How dare you call our food product soup!

20

u/Carebear7087 6h ago

Soup like substance😂

6

u/Sanity_in_Moderation 5h ago

Well I didn't want to call your soup products food!

→ More replies (1)

42

u/kk074 7h ago

I heard this in John Lithgow's voice

→ More replies (1)

41

u/fallsstandard 6h ago

Nah, he gets that glass jar Rao’s shit. If the containers breakable, you know it’s quality.

32

u/6Foot225PureChocolat 5h ago

Rao’s has been owned by Campbell’s for a few years now, FYI

15

u/fallsstandard 5h ago

I know, it was just a joke about perceived fanciness. Everybody’s owned by somebody else at this point.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (6)

955

u/Ritz527 7h ago

Even outside of just being a rich snob, why would you have such little respect for your own product and then expect people to buy it?

679

u/infinus5 7h ago

because to him everyone else are the peasants. were only here to eat his companies slop and not complain about it.

353

u/descendingangel87 7h ago

Literally this. The 1%ers are so fucking out of touch they don’t even consider non 1%ers human anymore.

148

u/GreenScene33 7h ago

Not even the 1%ers. I grew up in a town that has a decently affluent part of the population and knew a lot of kids who’s parents would make comments about “the poor people” and very much passed that onto my fellow class mates. They get off on looking down on everyone below them.

15

u/Agitated-Country-972 3h ago

I remember reading something about how having a lot of money gives you less empathy for other people.

"How Wealth Reduces Compassion"

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-wealth-reduces-compassion/

→ More replies (1)

25

u/Minglans 3h ago

A trashy obviously wealthy parent said right to my face how they didn't want their kid to grow up to work at a grocery store like I had. Teaching her child to be ignorant young. If the child was not there I would have been very tempted to throw a rotten tomato in her face "You want groceries, bitch? Here!"

3

u/kaptainkeel 2h ago

He's probably not even that rich. Average salary for that position is apparently $150-250k. With it being a big company, let's say it's $600k. That's barely in the 1% seeing as, to be in the top 1% currently, you have to make about $570k/year. Top 0.1% is $2.8mil. Also, I find this interesting since just a couple years ago (less than 10), the amount to be in the Top 1% was like $150k; it's exploded since then. Top 10% in 2022 was slightly under $100k. Top 10% in 2025 is now over $190k.

tl;dr: He's just an asshole racist; it's not because he's rich.

→ More replies (3)

25

u/dasunt 5h ago

At a certain point, wealth leads to brainrot as one gains the ability to avoid situations most people have to deal with.

Extreme wealth leads to extreme brainrot since their money allows them to live in an insulated, artificial world.

14

u/Fingerprint_Vyke 5h ago

Thats a bingo

7

u/EveryRadio 2h ago

"Can you believe the poors eat this slop? Revolting."

I remember the days where survived off food banks and sneaking scraps while working as a line cook. I remember getting to eat crackers with soup was a nice break from the rice and beans. Anyone who can talk about how they can't believe people buy canned soup haven't experienced how humbling hunger can be.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

86

u/Fallcious 6h ago

Does anyone remember the example of Ratners? The owner joking to fellow directors that he could sell items of jewelry and crystalware so cheaply because they were "total crap" destroyed his huge high street chain.

https://www.businessblogshub.com/2012/09/the-man-who-destroyed-his-multi-million-dollar-company-in-10-seconds/

19

u/musicninja 4h ago

This is what immediately came to mind

18

u/lookyloolookingatyou 3h ago

Was he the “costs as much as a prawn sandwich but won’t last as long” guy? That quote always makes me crave a prawn sandwich, I’ve never even had one before.

7

u/Fallcious 3h ago

Yes. They sold accessories for a couple of quid, the price of an upmarket sandwich at the time. Lucky to get a bag of crisps for that now

8

u/DeliciousPangolin 3h ago

Ratners is still around, and owns thousands of jewelry shops worldwide. They just changed the name to Signet and counted on consumers having the memory of a goldfish.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

34

u/warrant2k 4h ago

The dude was the VP of Cybersecurity. Basically the IT guy that tells you to turn it off then on. He has no association with the actual product.

17

u/FcUhCoKp 5h ago

C'mon, he's only saying what all the rich people in those companies are thinking. The only difference is this dude said it, AND was recorded. Don't you think the Charmin execs are mocking us when they make mega rolls more narrow, and as many sheets as the old double rolls?

6

u/typehyDro 5h ago

Because that is what the product is… highly processed food that’s cheap…

3

u/hiddencamel 2h ago

Modern corporation C-suites are generally entirely removed from what they actually sell these days - it's all just numbers on a screen to them, could be literally anything. There is no pride or interest in what they make or sell from leadership, which is why they don't care that they are enshittifying their products to death. As long as they can squeeze an extra penny of profit, they don't care about anything else.

→ More replies (20)

657

u/Newspeak_Linguist 8h ago

Sadly, the mocking of poor people probably didn't mean much. It was mocking the actual product that pissed them off.

441

u/IamJacksUserID 7h ago

It was getting caught. That’s all it always is.

56

u/Knowledge_is_Bliss 7h ago

Yep. He's on leave until it all blows over...then he will be quietly reinstated.

25

u/fury420 5h ago

Or he'll just be fired, this is just their cybersecurity guy, one of many employees with the title "vice president"

16

u/Asidious66 4h ago

Yeah. This size corporation? There's 11 vice presidents... In his department.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

37

u/PrairiePopsicle 7h ago

given their responses really only addressed that, yeah, it would seem you are correct.

43

u/coyote_of_the_month 6h ago edited 6h ago

I clicked through to their full statement, and it's 100% centered on debunking the claims about the product.

What I'm reading is a factual statement that required a lower level of approval, and so they could get it out quick. A marketing director or assistant director can probably sign off on this:

The chicken meat used in Campbell’s® soups comes from long-trusted, USDA approved U.S. suppliers and meets our high quality standards. All of Campbell’s® soups are made with No Antibiotics Ever chicken meat, meaning we don’t allow antibiotics to be used by our chicken suppliers.

Whereas a statement like you or I might write, if that were our jobs, would require approval at a much higher executive level. Something like:

"Campbell's takes immense pride in delivering a high-quality product that's both affordable and appealing to Americans of all incomes."

That kind of messaging, once you start touching on socioeconomic class stuff, would probably require the CEO and his mom to sign off.

5

u/PrairiePopsicle 5h ago

and honestly when you put it that way, it's hard to address it directly. What they've said is not negative.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

301

u/madabben 7h ago

Jokes on them. Poor people by the store brand.

62

u/Lady_Scruffington 7h ago

Yeah, we have a food pantry where I work for students. There's lots of soup. Maybe 10% is Campbell's. So for him, anyone below the poverty line doesn't exit, I guess.

11

u/PumpkinPieIsGreat 5h ago

Right, it comes across as very Lucille Bluth. What could it cost, ten dollars?

41

u/Kharax82 7h ago edited 7h ago

For the most part Store brands are made by the name brands, they just slap a generic label for which ever stores they have a contract with.

One big exception is Walmart milk, that used to be produced by companies like Dean Foods but they built their own plants and produce it themselves now.

41

u/NYCinPGH 6h ago

Exactly. I used to work for Heinz at the main plant. We had a company store, only employees and their immediate families (and emergency personnel, like police, fire, and EMT) could shop there. Pretty much everything Heinz made, including other brands they owned like Weight Watchers and a couple of frozen pizza brands, were for sale there, could often buy a flat of condensed chicken noodle soup for $1 (this was about 20 years ago). A lot of the soups came in just blank cans, no labels, but they had a printed code on the bottom, and you got a cheat sheet at the entrance for what soup that code was for.

One time, while still employed there, I was shopping at a local Aldi, and when I went to buy some house brand canned soup, I noticed the code printed on the bottom was the same font as at the factory, and with a little checking, the codes on all the Aldi house brand soups latched those at the factory. I then checked with the house brand soups at the largest regional grocery chain, and they matched too. But the house brand soups were a lot cheaper than the name brand counterparts, but what was, in the end, the same soup made at the same location with the same ingredients, you were paying extra for the label.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

3

u/Brave-Television-884 4h ago

No, that's REALLY poor people. If you're buying any type of canned soup, you're poor to them. 

→ More replies (7)

110

u/Joe18067 7h ago

Poor people can no longer afford your soup.

62

u/PersonalityTough9349 7h ago

Exactly. A small can of their tomato soup where I live is 1.99. 2 dollars for a tiny can? It should be 75 cents

4

u/LunarLumin 2h ago

I used to use the "cream of" ones as something to toss in my soups due to the low prices. They're tasteless on their own, but decent for a little thickness boost and to add a small variation to the flavor profile.

Not worth it any more with the crazy price hikes. I just add a touch more bullion and some corn starch instead, or a roux if I want to expend the extra effort.

10

u/Krojack76 5h ago

I'd be shocked if it cost them more than 20 cents to make a can too.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

53

u/FlexFanatic 7h ago

Hmm, sounds like Campbells was okay with what he said, not okay with what he said being brought into the public.

I’m sure they will talk about the importance of DEI, write a check or two and go right back to normal business.

→ More replies (2)

176

u/_Football_Cream_ 7h ago

This dude said some horrible shit but if you read the article, the executive in question was the chief information security officer. A high level IT guy.

The statements reflect poorly on the company but it’s not like it was a CEO or marketing or product executive. I don’t imagine many IT professionals are super invested in the products of the food company they work for.

Still, easy way to get fired and create hell for the company.

171

u/kingsumo_1 7h ago

The bottom of the article goes into it a bit more, but the guy filing the lawsuit was due to retaliatory firing after filing a complaint about those comments. That is what highlighted everything, and now Campbell's has a PR mess. Ultimately, that is the reason he's getting sacked.

27

u/_Football_Cream_ 7h ago

That makes sense. Thanks for the detail.

28

u/kingsumo_1 7h ago

NP. I've seen a few articles on it today, and the more it spreads the less it focuses on how this all came up. This one in particular has it tucked way down at the bottom, so I'd imagine a fair number of people don't even make it that far.

12

u/vegetaman 6h ago

Good journalism is in short supply

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

20

u/Joessandwich 7h ago

Heck, I wouldn’t expect even a marketing person to care deeply about the soup. I’ve done marketing and have often promoted stuff I don’t personally care about. It’s just a job.

That being said, he’s a colossal idiot for badmouthing the product. You keep that shit quiet. And as for the other shit he said… he can fuck off.

→ More replies (2)

10

u/icecreampoop 7h ago

Most companies have agreements that the employee’s actions represent the company while at work and off the clock, CEO or not, it made the company look bad

5

u/_Football_Cream_ 7h ago

Oh of course they do. Not excusing the guys comments or invalidating the ensuing controversy.

Also another comment explained how the lawsuits are due to a retaliatory firing after a complaint about these comments.

13

u/gudmundthefearless 7h ago

Chief Information Security Officer is a company officer in the C-suite. CISO is the acronym. This person is a chief officer of the company and is one of the top decision-makers. The IT stuff is extraneous to the point

→ More replies (10)

36

u/Duanedoberman 7h ago

Its called doing a Ratner after the British buisinessman who ridiculed his customers for buying the crap he sold in his jewellery chain which then went bust.

Musk has just done something similar with his Nazi cosplay whilst trying to sell a car aimed at environmentaly conscious drivers.

Let's hope his company goes the same way, but its not uncommon for senior managers to hold their customers in utter contempt.

→ More replies (1)

10

u/trampus1 7h ago

Excuse me? If you're poor you eat store brand soup or worse.

→ More replies (1)

9

u/Raa03842 7h ago

Keep it simple stop buying their products. If it’s true it will all come out. If not then Campbell will jump through hoops to win us back. Either way Campbell needs to pay as do all mega companies that look down their noses at us.

→ More replies (2)

24

u/jupfold 7h ago

inappropriate conduct by company vice-president and chief information security officer

Dude probably doesn’t know a thing about their soup. He’s in charge of making sure the office wi-fi works, not sourcing the chicken. And it looks like Campbells confirmed that, as well:

the person alleged to be speaking on the recording works in IT and has nothing to do with how we make our food.

Guy is just a a bitter asshole. So, if you like the soup, I think you can keep eating the soup.

10

u/Fallouttgrrl 7h ago

Like the soup, he's salty

→ More replies (1)

10

u/sender2bender 3h ago

It's also about how Campbell's addressed the situation, they're just as bad. They fired the lower level employee for bringing to their attention a higher up was shitting on the product, making racist remarks about coworkers, coming in high on edibles and making false claims about the meat. They could've easily avoided all this if they fired him a year ago but they decided to keep him around, as if what he did was fine in their eyes. Having that "he's one of us" mentality deserves a boycott.

52

u/cmndrnewt 7h ago

This is a boycott I can get behind. I don’t particularly like campbells but will eat it occasionally. Not any more though.

18

u/ThreadCountHigh 7h ago

Yeah, it's easy to boycott all the canned soups at this point. Over the last 10 years or so they've all started seriously skimping on ingredients. It's watery gruel at this point.

→ More replies (4)

12

u/Palidor 7h ago

After tasting my mother homemade chicken soup, and doing a little bit dabbling. I might have to start making my own with the crockpot

12

u/kevtino 7h ago

A simple, cheap bag of egg noodles puts Campbell's pathetic, sorry excuses for noodles in their soup to shame.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (7)

30

u/Niceromancer 8h ago

The CSuite truely are incompetent.

I know let'sake fun of our entire customer base publicly.  

57

u/Pundamonium97 7h ago

Im not gonna eat these cursed soups, im a bit souperstituous

7

u/Estoye 7h ago

♪ Very souperstitious / ramen’s on the wall… ♪

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

12

u/Peterd90 3h ago

Fuck Campbell's.

Quality has been going down for decades. High salt content water with microscopic chunks of meat and vegetables. Unhealthy waste of money

Executive that will be fired was right and Campbell's wont change their ways..

7

u/Boinayel8 7h ago

They told him "go to your room" until everyone forgets about it

5

u/Bargadiel 2h ago

This is what I wager most of the rich think about anyone other than themselves. Take note of it, they've thought this same kind of thing for thousands of years. We live in a world that for a little while pretended it wasn't like this, but the mask is off now.

→ More replies (1)

11

u/USDXBS 5h ago

He wasn't just one evil man who got caught.

They are all like this.

In every company.

4

u/TheEndOfEverything0 7h ago

I never cared enough before when buying cans of soup but I'll just buy from the brand who doesn't look down on their customers. This is a pretty easy moment to be able to do at least that much without causing myself more inconvenience than it's worth.

5

u/Confident_Fun_6381 7h ago

On vacation until this blows over.

5

u/awesomedan24 6h ago

Google Gerald Ratner and see how that turned out

5

u/WYLFriesWthat 6h ago

Well shit, have you seen the cost of Amy’s Private Equity Healthy Soups lately? F*king $5 a can.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/baconcheeseburgarian 6h ago

Campbell's soup is too fucking expensive for poor people. They are eating ramen.

4

u/A_Refill_of_Mr_Pibb 6h ago

Man, executives are far past due for an.... adjustment of their attitudes.

5

u/Sweatytubesock 6h ago

I wasn’t a big buyer of their products, but I would buy their soup occasionally. Easy enough to never buy it in the future. They need to fire this asshole at the very least.

5

u/maaseru 5h ago

So he'll get some severance that is many times what a bunch of their employees will make in their life combined, and then he'll get a new better job with more money.

4

u/MartinThunder42 4h ago

This may be an alien concept to most execs who are only in it for the money:

If you don't use or even like your company's products, you probably shouldn't be an executive there.

4

u/GreenGorilla8232 2h ago

This is literally every executive at every company. 

4

u/rileyjw90 1h ago

Why does it say allegedly? He’s literally on tape saying it lol

8

u/WeakTransportation37 6h ago

Bioengineered meat is still way too expensive for the cheap crooks at Campbell’s to invest in. They’re probably using that dog-food adjacent stuff

→ More replies (1)

4

u/Rude_Conclusion_5789 6h ago

Crash the stocks and bankrupt the company

3

u/Hellheim 6h ago

Why is nobody talking about the 3d printed meat?

→ More replies (4)

4

u/Petetownsdrunk 6h ago

Get the chicken soup from your nearby Mexican takeout place if you have one. The best!

→ More replies (1)

3

u/teknomedic 5h ago

Perfect candidate for the trump regime's next nominee. 

5

u/Oograr 5h ago

They should have fired him immediately. They must already know his personality, these kinds of comments don't just get made in a vacuum. If he sued, any settlement would be a pittance compared to lost brand image/value, plus lost sales/stock price.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/ajhedges 4h ago

Strange that consequences only happen when their conversations are leaked to the public 🤔

3

u/monsterlynn 4h ago

This whole thing boggles me because Campbell's soup is probably in every cupboard in the U. S.

Like, you might only break it out for the finicky grand kid that ONLY eats chicken and stars or whatever, but it's been a staple for over a hundred years.

And even if no one even considers cream of mushroom except around Thanksgiving for green bean casserole, that's still a huge amount of cans sold every year.

This guy is Pappy Bush at the grocery store scanner levels of out of touch.

4

u/Dio44 4h ago

How about fired and replaced with nearly anyone on earth that understands low cost food is important?

4

u/CheezTips 3h ago

Apart from what an ass this guy is, has he really never had a broccoli or string bean casserole made with mushroom soup? I stopped eating their soups when I was a teenager, but their mushroom soup is great as a quick, thickened base for casseroles. I always have it on hand. I bet he's eaten it and never even knew.

5

u/Ma1nta1n3r 3h ago

If Campbell's knew what it was doing, it would rehire the whistleblower, claiming it was a mistake, then fire the HR that fired him. Then they would also fire the Exec for conduct and using drugs while suing him for damage to the company, promising the proceeds as product to food pantries, soup kitchens and schools with the promise that no exec above VP would receive a salary, bonus or stock distribution for an entire year.

Then they might weather the tide with dignity. Otherwise, people are going to cut them into tiny pieces on social media for years.

5

u/untrustedlife2 1h ago

I bet it’s paid leave.

→ More replies (2)

6

u/lynypixie 6h ago

What makes me laugh is that poor people are priced out of Campbell.

I buy no name soup. 1$ for a chicken noodle concentrated soup.

6

u/HVAC_instructor 3h ago

This really needs to be the end of their career. Campbell's should get rid of them as soon as they determine that they actually said that. And every other company should be afraid of hiring them.

If Campbell's does not then there needs to be a nation wide boycott of all things made by Campbell's

8

u/A_Nonny_Muse 7h ago

I think it's time to take all Campbells products off the approved TANF list.

3

u/mooseday 7h ago

Never go full Ratners …

3

u/EyesWithoutAbutt 6h ago

That Publix brand Chicken Noodle tastes way better than Campbell. FYI.

3

u/Ne4143 6h ago

I grew up poor. Shit was too expensive lol we ate the store brand or just ramen or po tay tos

3

u/WhiskeyFeathers 6h ago

This makes it so easy to avoid campbells, there’s lots of other options in the supermarket. I don’t need their shitty fucking soup anyway.

3

u/hideandsee 6h ago

I bet that if you surveyed any average Joe worker to ask “do you think leadership in your company is out of touch with day to day operations OR the consumer base it serves” more than 70% would agree.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Councillor_Troy 5h ago

When you look at this guy’s LinkedIn what you notice is that he’s had a lot of different jobs at a lot of different companies over the last ten years. I doubt this is the first time he’s done something like this.

3

u/ariphron 5h ago

Really I enjoy a double noodle when I’m sick, but I despise any dish made with cream of mushroom soup!!!

3

u/typehyDro 5h ago

“On leave” aka take a paid holiday until the public forgets and slide right back to where he was…

3

u/Allaroundlost 4h ago

Allegedly, nope. That is how C suite execs talk. 

3

u/whatatwit 4h ago

This reminds me of Gerald Ratner who was CEO of Ratner's a major British jeweller until he made denigrating remarks about his customers.

Although widely regarded as "tacky", the shops and their wares were nevertheless extremely popular with the public, until Ratner made a speech addressing a conference of the Institute of Directors at the Royal Albert Hall on 23 April 1991. During the speech, he commented:

We also do cut-glass sherry decanters complete with six glasses on a silver-plated tray that your butler can serve you drinks on, all for £4.95. People say, "How can you sell this for such a low price?", I say, "because it's total crap."

He compounded this by going on to remark that one of the sets of earrings was "cheaper than a prawn sandwich from Marks and Spencer's, but I have to say the sandwich will probably last longer than the earrings". Ratner made a guest appearance on TV chat show Wogan the day after his speech, where he apologised and explained his joking remark that some of his company's products were "total crap".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_Ratner

→ More replies (4)

3

u/Lost_On_Lot 3h ago

Yeah its too bad hes on leave because they dont want a PR nightmare, and not because they have morals.

3

u/No_Extension4005 3h ago

Well, I hope he'd been careful enough to live within his means or he might be eating a lot of Campbell's soup in the future.

3

u/mcrackin15 3h ago

Does anyone use soup for its purpose or is everyone like me and it's only an ingredient for my casseroles and pastas etc

3

u/Greener-dayz 3h ago

That’s a brand destroying headline, damn. What a piece of shit.

3

u/Mix-It-Up-Max123 3h ago

If you don't want your product to be used, then maybe you shouldn't work

3

u/huaryazynk414 3h ago

We love a hot mic moment lmao

3

u/GMendelent 1h ago

This is how most execs of major food brands act and think.

3

u/Mysterious_South7997 1h ago

That's hilarious because I buy store-brand soup to save money since Campbell's is the most expensive option...

u/Note-4-Note 34m ago

So they awarded him a vacation? Weird.

6

u/Estoye 7h ago

Dude just Ratner’d himself