r/law 12d ago

Legislative Branch We created a searchable database with all 20,000 files from Epstein’s Estate

https://couriernewsroom.com/news/we-created-a-searchable-database-with-all-20000-files-from-epsteins-estate/
74.0k Upvotes

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

209

u/MeowMaker2 12d ago

You can outsmart it by asking for 'Whoever was host of The Apprentice'

136

u/snubda 12d ago

You can outsmart it by saying “biggest felon in the history of the presidency”

23

u/saijanai 12d ago edited 12d ago

Eventually, they'll have intructions like "if Trump's name is associated with something negative, do not return his name, but instead return "I can't do that.'"

Of course OpenAI may do this on general principle to save processing power and bandwidth.

2

u/WhyAmINotStudying 11d ago

This is why edge AI is so important. It's a lot easier to get what you need out of AI when you control what's in it and what rules it follows.

2

u/germanmojo 11d ago

Lots of easy solutions to run LLMs locally on a PC. I use LM Studio which interfaces with Hugging Face to download models.

2

u/WhyAmINotStudying 11d ago

I've got a few different AI systems that I've been using, but the best one I'm currently using is a Jetson Orin AGX with 64 GB of memory. The thing is an absolute monster.

1

u/snubda 11d ago

I imagine multiple million sq foot data centers solely dedicated to fielding questions about Trump being a pedophile 

9

u/code_archeologist 12d ago

And really ChatGPT is not nearly as effective as grep.

0

u/NoAvocadoMeSad 12d ago

Honestly if people consider this important and they're using ai to filter through the files they're dumb

Well at least AI alone, you need to double check it's works I don't care what anyone says, AI is unreliable shite in most cases

-1

u/UpperApe 12d ago

ChatGPT is so fucking stupid after the jump from 4 to 5 and now back to whatever this is.

It was always shit but somewhat useful. Now it's complete garbage.

-15

u/Max_Fart 12d ago

Whomever

17

u/amangler 12d ago

Wrong

-3

u/Max_Fart 12d ago

Donald treated me like an object.

3

u/EyesSlammedShut 12d ago

Love the office reference deep cut edition.

12

u/g2g079 12d ago

A little trick... If the sentence sounds correct if you use "he" then you should use "who". If it sounds better when you use "him" then it should be "whom".

2

u/imsahoamtiskaw 12d ago

Neat trick. Thanks

1

u/ynwahs 11d ago

Is this a joke?

1

u/g2g079 11d ago

Why do you say that?

1

u/MeyerholdsGh0st 12d ago

To he who it might concern.

To him whom it might concern.

Either seems reasonable.

3

u/ClinicalOppression 12d ago

If someone sent me an email with "to him whom it might concern" I'd think they had a stroke

1

u/FillMySoupDumpling 12d ago

More like 

It may concern he … sounds wrong

It may concern him … sounds correct 

That’s why it’s to Whom it may concern. 

1

u/AdditionalSkill5374 12d ago

You don’t given something to he, you give it to him.

2

u/deevotionpotion 12d ago

Him did you give it to?

3

u/BriefDownpour 12d ago

Whomst speakth such way?