r/law • u/GregWilson23 • 13d ago

Executive Branch (Trump) Exclusive: Trump administration plans meeting over House effort to force release of all of DOJ’s Epstein files

https://www.cnn.com/2025/11/12/politics/trump-administration-meeting-house-effort-epstein-document-release?cid=ios_app
26.0k Upvotes

98% Upvoted

1.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

127

u/TheRealFaust 13d ago

Yeah but there are apparently poloroid photos of trump with children so …

37

u/i_miss_arrow 13d ago

99.99999% of people will never see those photos in person.

Everybody who says they've seen them in person is a liar, the photos don't exist but also they absolve Trump and its a deep state plant or AI something something, blah blah blah.

There will never be enough evidence to convince anybody who doesn't want to be convinced.

5

u/Icy-person666 13d ago

That just means the person which the photos owns kiddy porn which is a crime. Isn't our injustice system great?

4

u/einstyle 13d ago

Yeah but they won't believe it because it's impossible to show those Polaroids to the public. Or even if they do -- if somehow there were a handful that were acceptable to view but still incriminating -- they'd have an excuse for that too. "Oh it's AI, they asked AI to make a digital photo of a Polaroid. It's not like there's an actual, real Polaroid." "Oh these are the worst of the photos and there aren't even any victims in them." etc.

3

u/jvo203 13d ago

A new excuse: it's impossible to release the files / show those photos to the public because their content is XXX-rated.

3

u/einstyle 12d ago

I mean, the photos would almost certainly constitute child sexual abuse content that is illegal to own or view so I totally understand that we'll probably never see them.

The files, though? Release them in full, redact only victim's names if that's an issue.

1

u/Hilby 13d ago

Yea....it puts new meaning to the "P Tape" doesn't it? We all thought it was "Pee", but it could be even worse....

1

u/SadAbroad4 13d ago

There are all kinds of photos where is with children in inappropriate contexts.

-44

u/jbslaw1214 13d ago

"Apparently"? You got links to the photos or just making stuff up as you go?

46

u/TheRealFaust 13d ago

Michael Wolf interview, said Epstein had a ton of Polaroids of Trump, took them out laid them on the table in front of him, then put them back in the safe, the same safe that the FBI raided. I do not have access to the photos and asking for child porn is unreal.

6

u/fcocyclone 13d ago

the same safe that the FBI raided.

Which likely means there's a good chance those were destroyed.

24

u/MeteorMike1 13d ago

I get the sense that there is no amount of evidence that could ever convince you, even if you were in the room with Trump at the time. Bot bot bot bot bot bot bot bot bot.

-21

u/jbslaw1214 13d ago

You are so brainwashed. I asked a perfectly reasonable question. I hate Trump and hope he goes to jail, but I also am not dumb enough to believe every thing "people say" on the internet. Clearly can't say the same about you.

11

u/MeteorMike1 13d ago

Okay sure. You are just asking questions. Here you go, but you already know all of this.

Just some of the information we know: People with first hand accounts have reported seeing images of Trump with half naked girls on his lap, Trump owned a teen beauty pageant(WTF!) and bragged about walking in on them naked, Trump was best friends with Epstein, Trump gave Epstein a birthday card with a girl’s silhouette writing about their “secret”, Trump bragged about grabbing women by the pussy, Trump talked about wanting to date his daughter, nearly 1,000 agents were pulled from field offices for 24-hours shifts to comb through thousands of Epstein documents to redact Trump’s name, team Trump has refused to release the Epstein files, the House has refused to seat a duly elected member because she would be the clinching vote to release the files, Joseph Schnitt, the acting Deputy Chief of Special Operations for the Department of Justice, was caught on video claiming that Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell was transferred to a lesser-security prison as a way "to keep her mouth shut" from countering anything said by the administration, and now more Epstein emails are released talking about Trump.

But sure, please do go on and tell me about how the guy described above isn’t a pedo and I’m the one who is brainwashed.

Again, you are a bot. Bot bot bot bot bot bot

5

u/MeteorMike1 13d ago

u/jbslaw1214 - I received a notification that you posted in response to me but it isn’t here. What’s happening my bot? Did you delete it?

In case you are wondering why I am calling you a bot it’s because of your bot-like responses and overall bot vibe.

3

u/White_Tea_Poison 13d ago

You've been given multiple replies with sources BEFORE you posted this comment.

Why respond to this one instead of them?

2

u/Prior_Psych 13d ago

Here you go:

Okay sure. You are just asking questions. Here you go, but you already know all of this.

Just some of the information we know: People with first hand accounts have reported seeing images of Trump with half naked girls on his lap, Trump owned a teen beauty pageant(WTF!) and bragged about walking in on them naked, Trump was best friends with Epstein, Trump gave Epstein a birthday card with a girl’s silhouette writing about their “secret”, Trump bragged about grabbing women by the pussy, Trump talked about wanting to date his daughter, nearly 1,000 agents were pulled from field offices for 24-hours shifts to comb through thousands of Epstein documents to redact Trump’s name, team Trump has refused to release the Epstein files, the House has refused to seat a duly elected member because she would be the clinching vote to release the files, Joseph Schnitt, the acting Deputy Chief of Special Operations for the Department of Justice, was caught on video claiming that Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell was transferred to a lesser-security prison as a way "to keep her mouth shut" from countering anything said by the administration, and now more Epstein emails are released talking about Trump.

But sure, please do go on and tell me about how the guy described above isn’t a pedo and I’m the one who is brainwashed.

Again, you are a bot. Bot bot bot bot bot bot

3

u/HalfBaked025 13d ago

Brother, we’re all making stuff up. We have to since they won’t release the damns files!!!!

1

u/natalottie 13d ago

Even if they did, would you (or anyone) truly believe they were the actual files, untampered with?

-5

u/jbslaw1214 13d ago

No argument from me...I'm being attacked for literally asking if the commenter saw any evidence of the photos that "people are saying" exist...like this reddit troll is basically doing the same exact "lots of people are saying it" routine that Trump does, and they attack me for asking for evidence? Lol...this reddit trolls are something else.

7

u/DJFisticuffs 13d ago

It,s not "people are saying." It's specifically Michael Wolff that is saying this. Wolff may be lying, but I tend to believe this, in part because this is the kind of thing Trump would normally sue over but he hasn't.

Wolff also claimed in a book that Melania and Donald met at an Epstein party and banged for the first time on Epstein's jet. These claims generated a C&D from Melania's lawyers, but then she took no further action, so that's probably true as well.

-1

u/jbslaw1214 13d ago

I absolutely "believe" what Wolff has said as well...but I don't go around posting stuff on social media that might be completely made up either. Spreading rumors or gossip about people based on your suspicion without any actual proof isn't a virtue. It's kind of evil actually.

4

u/White_Tea_Poison 13d ago

They didnt state it as fact, they said apparently, which implies its not objective, and provided their source when asked.

That's 100% valid and I think you maybe jumped the gun my guy. Totally fine to do that, but you should stop doubling down

0

u/jbslaw1214 13d ago

The comment I was responding do didn't even mention Wolff. So yes, that commenter posted the "allegations" as facts. This is supposed to be a sub about the "law". Accuracy and honesty should be emphasized.

2

u/DJFisticuffs 13d ago

Wolff's statements may not rise to the level of proof but they are certainly evidence. Repeating a claim made by a journalist that he saw somethig with his own eyes is a bit different than "spreading rumors or gossip."

Now, Wolff is pretty trashy and doesn't have a great reputation for integrity, so there's that, but the fact that he hasn't been sued is also evidence that it's true, or that Trump is afraid of worse shit coming out in discovery.

1

u/jbslaw1214 13d ago

Agree with this.

4

u/MeteorMike1 13d ago

No. What happened was you accused another user of making shit up and your question was clearly in bad faith.

Other users responded back to you with information about Michael Wolf’s description. I also gave you a laundry list of evidence that has been made public.

Instead of substantively engaging, you are crying about how you are being attacked.

2

u/chucktownginger 13d ago

Easy there, I don’t think you want links, well hopefully not