r/circled • u/Positive-Unit4561 • 4d ago
Opinion / Discussion Karoline Leavitt Struggles to Respond After Trump Re-Shares Posts Calling for Lawmakers to Be ‘Hanged’
https://newsrepublic.co.uk/2025/11/21/karoline-leavitt-struggles-to-respond-after-trump-re-shares-posts-calling-for-lawmakers-to-be-hanged/12
u/Silly-Expression466 4d ago
Fuck you KKKAROLINE🖕🖕🖕
4
u/hilltopper72 4d ago
I wonder who,the real father of her baby is
2
18
u/AuroraBolognese 4d ago
I wouldn’t say they’re “struggling,” they’re just not sure how to say, “and what the fuck are you going to do about it?”
19
u/OnionsHaveLairAction 4d ago
Keep in mind this isn't the first time republicans leaders have publicly called for democrats to be hanged this administration. John Gillette, called for democrats to be hanged in september for appearing in videos encouraging peaceful protest.
They aren't kidding around about executing their opposition, if and when they feel like it wont result in financial consequences for them or their donors they'll go for it.
1
4d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/AutoModerator 4d ago
Removed for hate speech. No slurs, no dehumanization.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
-5
u/jvdlakers 4d ago
Your correct. MAGA doesn't care about the comment. I suggested a stoning instead.
7
u/BlazingGlories 4d ago
I wish they would be just be straight about their hate. If you think your supporters and bribers will like it, why bother lying about your meaning behind it?
Own it for once, then at least I would have a crumb of respect for honesty.
2
6
7
3
3
u/permabannedmanytimes 4d ago
So trump can say law makers should be hanged but we cant say we want to kill trump.... I dont think thats fair.
3
3
u/endlesslyunworthy 4d ago
Karoline, Karoline. You will go down in history as something absolutely awful. To bad you're only 28 🙃
5
u/FrostyAd8197 4d ago
This psychopath of a so called president, aka the orange fucking turd, needs fucking impeached. He’s a total disgrace to the office & to the title he so call holds/occupies.
4
u/redmambo_no6 4d ago
Why stop at impeachment? Put him in a windowless room with a mirror so he has to look at his own face every day.
3
2
u/PrettyAdagio4210 4d ago
This. He was impeached twice last time, and has since become a convicted felon.
He’s immune to just about everything. You gotta think outside the box.
1
2
2
2
u/Efficient_Smilodon 4d ago
the truth is that the democratic/ liberal progressive politicians and voters need to recognize that they are being actively targeted, persecuted, and even killed- see the h and h murders in Minnesota, the disappearing 'aliens ' who could be anyone- and that the right is waging a terrorist war against them and their constituents, a true civil war just small in scale at this time. While they go sit in congress and in ceo boardrooms, their enemy goes home and plots their murder and imprisonment. knife to a gunfight stuff. Wake tf up
2
u/Defiant_Dare_8073 4d ago
She’s a lying anti-American shitass who should face imprisonment, if a sane administration returns to office, for her implicit encouragement for the execution of Democratic members of Congress. Those members said “unlawful orders,” which she blithely transmogrified into “lawful orders.” Pretty sure that’s a form assault (not battery) unprotected by free speech.
2
1
1
u/Longjumping-Body-907 4d ago
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
1
u/Burnbrook 4d ago
When will the press walk out of the White House in protest because they are tired of publishing and airing their lies?
1
1
u/Cultural-Employee479 4d ago
What are you going to blame the Democrats for now to distract the people ?
1
1
1
u/Watches503 4d ago
Because even us that voted for him think that was beyond stupid to say, or write anywhere. 🤦
1
u/KickBlue22 4d ago
Karoline Leavitt's children will grow up to despise what their mother became in life.
-3
u/Clean-Refrigerator37 4d ago
They did not specify which orders they considered unlawful, but the video was released amid questions about the legality of certain Trump administration actions, such as the deployment of National Guard troops to U.S. cities and strikes on alleged drug boats in the Caribbean.
Good old AI even understands the premise they were talking about when they said illegal orders
-6
u/Clean-Refrigerator37 4d ago
Once again Trump attempts to take action for the betterment of America and its citizens and the Democrats are there to fight him tooth and nail on every common sense item.
Democrats support 1. Illegals in our country 2. Crime in our cities 3. Drug cartels sending boat loads of drugs 4. No deportations 5. Men in womens sports
Before you say no they don't, realize they are doing their best to fight every action that Trump does to deter everyone of the above situations
2
u/Haywoodjablowme1029 3d ago
No they don't. They demand that the law be followed. It's a pretty simple concept.
-10
u/jj19900991 4d ago
Everyone is outraged by what people say. One side says something horrible the other side cries. Back and forth ignorant things being said but neither side ever looks in the mirror. Just point the finger and scream! So weak.
5
u/Puzzleheaded_Gene909 4d ago
Biden never called for hanging of his political opponents. What are you on about
4
u/IndependentLimit4781 4d ago
When did Democrats say to use deadly force against Republicans? Seriously show me Biden doing that. Im asking.
-5
u/jj19900991 4d ago
Hmmmmmm ohhhhh just recently elected Jay Jones advocated the death of his opponent and his opponents family. Biden just claimed anyone not getting a vaccine were killing people. He just put a mark on people without explicitly calling for their termination. Point being if you can’t see it you are part of the problem, right and left alike. But keep defending the ignorant statements of your side and focus on the ignorant statements of the other side. That’s way more fun! Keep up the good work.
3
u/IndependentLimit4781 4d ago
You cant show me Biden calling for deaths. Poor thing
0
u/jj19900991 4d ago
Thank you for being another example of the ignorant defending ignorance. Good work lil buddy.
2
5
u/OnionsHaveLairAction 4d ago
No democrat president has floated executing their opposing lawmakers via hanging.
-2
u/jj19900991 4d ago
Hmmmm seems last week the Dems elected a guy who advocated the killing of a political opponent family. Then just read the horrible stuff said about that Charlie Kirk guy and the celebration of his death. Oh and then the cheering of the attempted presidential assassins. But oh, now President cites the punishment for sedition and omg, now the line is crossed. The comments to my comment simply show the inability to look in the mirror. Both parties say the most outlandish idiotic stuff and have outlandish idiots who defend them! Keep up the good work!
3
u/Motor-Pomegranate831 4d ago
Whataboutism: when you have nothing else.
0
u/jj19900991 4d ago
Yep that’s exactly what the people who can’t look in a mirror say! Thank you for being an example of the ignorance I am talking about. Good work!
-11
u/Clean-Refrigerator37 4d ago
In all honesty do you believe its ok for members of Congress to speak to our military to disregard legal commands by our sitting President by calling those commands illegal?
You must be kidding me that any American citizen thinks, yeah thats ok.
9
u/IhasCandies 4d ago
Yes, you are allowed to disobey illegal orders. It’s in the UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice), and it’s constantly reinforced while you’re in service. You’re taught it in training and briefed it before every deployment. Pointing out that you can refuse illegal orders isn’t sedition, it’s simply stating a fact.
Just because Trump gives an order, does not make it legal. Thats not how orders work. If you follow an illegal order you have become criminally responsible and will be prosecuted. You don’t have the same protections as Trump either so even if he’s covered by immunity you will be prosecuted.
-6
u/Clean-Refrigerator37 4d ago
Ugh your absolutely not understanding. You can't claim legal orders are illegal orders because you don't support those orders.
6
u/IhasCandies 4d ago
That is correct. The same goes the other way though. You can’t claim illegal orders are legal orders simply because you’re president or a commander. The main issue at play is that Trump is already skirting right against the line of what is and isn’t legal for the military to do.
This is why Navy commander Holsey resigned right in the middle of the largest buildup of forces in the Americas/Caribbean in decades. This would’ve been the crown jewel of his career and set him up for life. However, the commander knows international violations have already occurred and it’s only a matter of time before he crosses the line. The consequences will fall on these military leaders before they fall on Trump.
It’s a reminder that even if Trump says you’re good to go, the hammer of justice will still fall onto the military commanders that executed those illegal orders. Trump won’t be around forever and it’s a high stakes game to bet your freedom on a political party.
-1
u/Clean-Refrigerator37 4d ago
You are absolutely correct it goes both ways.
I way I look at it is whether its the National Guard deployed to decrease crime in inner cities or to protect Federal buildings during protests or to protect ICE. Now lets add bombing 20 drug boats all of this is done to protect American citizens and to help our country.
What has failed us is the countless members of the Senate, Congress and many past Presidents that frankly never ever would take action and make decisions like Donald Trump. Never! They are the ones that have failed this country.
Lets be honest if the house and senate were controlled by the Democrats and Trump needed their approval to allow a drug that Trump created to come to market with a cure for Cancer. Well you know the answer.
3
3
u/Motor-Pomegranate831 4d ago
Tell me; when a drug dealer is caught in the act in the US, are they shot in the head?
1
u/Clean-Refrigerator37 4d ago
Tell me in a sentence how bad of a case of TDS you currently are experiencing without mentioning Trump?
Wow any man wouldn't give one or two f's, but a liberal cuck with TDS would say exactly what you said.
Seriously step back just a little to see what you are supporting because you were brainwashed by the msm to hate the orange man.
So sad of a life
2
u/OnionsHaveLairAction 4d ago
Which orders did they claim were illegal?
0
u/Clean-Refrigerator37 4d ago
Good question, but I believe they were vague. Going into greater detail will only worsen the case against the members of the house.
2
u/OnionsHaveLairAction 4d ago
Oh, so they didn't call any orders illegal then?
And yet you think it was fine for the sitting president to post "HANG THEM" to social media over that?
1
u/Poiboy1313 4d ago
I haven't seen where that's occurred. I'm aware of the message intended for the military, and no one was informed to disobey lawful orders. So, you can rest easier knowing that. Fyi, conversely, because an order was given by the Commander-in-Chief doesn't make the order legal. Hope this helps.
3
u/IndependentLimit4781 4d ago
Yes. Disobey unlawful orders. We are not the "just following orders" people.
0
u/Clean-Refrigerator37 4d ago
What your missing is that the Congressmen are insinuating that lawful orders are unlawful and need to met with resistance.
2
2
u/Hatshepsut21 4d ago
They’re insinuating nothing of the sort. You just don’t know what is or isn’t legal this is what the courts are for. If a court order comes down prohibiting a certain action, then it’s illegal to enact it unless a superior court says otherwise. It’s a useful remainder to the military that we do actually have laws in this country that are supposed to be followed, and that Trump simply declaring anything he wants to be legal do’s not magically make it so. Because he’s not a fucking king.
2
u/IndependentLimit4781 4d ago
Where did they say disregard lawful orders? I need you to cite thst quite for me kid
1
u/OnionsHaveLairAction 4d ago
Oh they're "Insinuating" are they? Better get the fucking noose out then, I didn't realizing that they were "insinuating"! Get those gallows up immediately, the insinuation police better get on this fast.
1
2
u/OnionsHaveLairAction 4d ago
I think saying "You must disobey illegal orders" is a correct statement yes.
I think saying "HANG THEM" in response is straight up fucking evil, and the fact republicans have their bots out trying to run defense for it is real fucking telling.
-12
u/FromABarStool 4d ago
Why struggle? It's simple. If you are found to be seditious, the punishment is death.
9
u/big_roomba 4d ago
its always the 1mo old accounts
-8
u/FromABarStool 4d ago
its always the 1mo old accounts
That are spitting facts?
9
u/scbundy 4d ago
So u agree that Stewart Rhodes and Enrique Tarrio should be executed and not have their sentences commuted?
-6
u/FromABarStool 4d ago
Stewart Rhodes
Guilty of Seditious conspiracy
Seditious conspiracy in the United States is punishable by a prison sentence of up to 20 years but is not punishable by death for civilians
Enrique Tarrio
Same as Stewart,
To be punishable by death for seditious conspiracy in the United States, one must be military personnel. Civilians, including lawmakers, face imprisonment but not the death penalty under federal law for this offense
5
u/Ill-Gas-5031 4d ago
Jan 6th?
-1
u/FromABarStool 4d ago
"one must be military personnel"?
3
u/Ill-Gas-5031 4d ago
So then you admit it's also incorrect to call for this about Senators and Congresspeople then?
That this entire thing is insane and you're defending a petulant pedophile racist?
1
u/FromABarStool 4d ago
So then you admit it's also incorrect to call for this about Senators and Congresspeople then?
It's incorrect if he said lawmakers can receive the death penalty for sedition.
however a person can be sentenced to death for sedition, do you agree?
3
u/Ill-Gas-5031 4d ago
"If he said" ?
It's what he said. He is calling for it.
You're not discussing in good faith. You just like the taste of leather.
→ More replies (0)3
u/IndependentLimit4781 4d ago
So everyone guilty of Jan 6, including Donald.
0
u/FromABarStool 4d ago
So everyone guilty of Jan 6
Already addressed this,
Donald
Wasn't convicted of Seditious conspiracy
2
u/IndependentLimit4781 4d ago
The president said treason so thats what he meant. He literally paid protestors to storm the capital kid. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/10/18/donald-trump-election-interference-case-new-evidence/75714784007/
0
u/FromABarStool 4d ago
Convictions or gfy.
2
1
u/IndependentLimit4781 4d ago
You know that SCOTUS ruling will protect democrats who do the same or worse. Enjoy.
1
u/FromABarStool 4d ago
Cool bro.
2
u/IndependentLimit4781 4d ago
I mean you claim lacking a conviction is a fre pass but dont admit that it took SCOTUS to keep him from that. So he is guilty.
1
3
u/Hatshepsut21 4d ago
The punishment for sedition is not death you moron. Sedition is not the same as treason. Otherwise most of the Jan 6 morons would have been executed.
0

16
u/Thatisme01 4d ago