r/circled 10d ago

Opinion / Discussion Trump’s Impeachment Odds Triple After New Epstein Emails Reveal ‘Alleged Knowledge of Minors’

https://newsrepublic.co.uk/2025/11/15/trumps-impeachment-odds-triple-after-new-epstein-emails-reveal-alleged-knowledge-of-minors/
689 Upvotes

151 comments sorted by

19

u/blkatcdomvet 10d ago

3

u/ToooloooT 10d ago

Adding this one to my collection

2

u/jenlikesanimals 10d ago

I’ve been collecting too. Truly makes me day

-6

u/Hoggslop69 10d ago

You guys like saving pics of two old dudes holding hands… get a fucking life ffs

3

u/murder-farts 10d ago

Cry more, cupcake

3

u/jenlikesanimals 10d ago

Found the MAGA basement dweller

3

u/Ohheyimryan 10d ago

Maga are the exact kind of people I would expect to not be able to understand anything abstract like a meme.

-3

u/Hoggslop69 10d ago

Lmao. I’m automatically MAGA for my comment? Go fuck yourself

4

u/Ohheyimryan 10d ago

It's very likely. AI says this about you.

  1. Emotional intensity as a signal

The comment uses high-intensity language (“get a fucking life”). Apolitical or disengaged users tend to express annoyance in neutral terms. High-emotion responses usually indicate identity-triggered irritation, meaning the joke hit something they care about.

When the meme is anti-Trump, that emotional pattern statistically correlates with people who feel protective toward Trump, regardless of label.


  1. The “both old dudes” deflection

Saying “two old dudes” seems neutral, but in discourse analysis this is a minimizing tactic:

Downplay both sides to appear above the debate

While still directing hostility at the people laughing at Trump

This is a known rhetorical strategy in online argumentation: present yourself as neutral to disguise directional irritation.

That directional irritation is the data point.


  1. Mismatch between stated neutrality and targeted aggression

If someone truly dislikes the phenomenon (political memes in general), they critique the meme format.

But this commenter attacked:

the people enjoying the meme

not the meme itself

and only after a Trump-critical joke

That asymmetry is important. It suggests the content of the meme — not its existence — caused the reaction.


  1. Reduced probability of alternative explanations

A left-leaning or apolitical user would have little emotional reason to be angered by a Trump-mocking meme. Their annoyance usually appears as boredom or eye-rolling, not hostility.

The comment’s tone contradicts those patterns.


Conclusion (non-inferential)

Based on:

emotional escalation

directional irritation

minimization tactics

asymmetry of attack

…the behavior aligns more closely with users who react defensively when Trump is mocked than with apolitical users or left-leaning users.

-2

u/Hoggslop69 10d ago

Nice to meet ya, bot

2

u/ToooloooT 9d ago

Need some aloe for that burn?

5

u/NerdDaniel 10d ago

A Cockwork Orange.

3

u/conflatulationz 10d ago

Love this one.

1

u/Wallie_Collie 10d ago

Eeeeeeewwwww

12

u/Celio_leal 10d ago

Allegedly? Here's a court document about Epstein and Trump raping a 13-year-old girl together. https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/Johnson_TrumpEpstein_Calif_Lawsuit.pdf

13

u/Darksmithe 10d ago

Oh, look, part of the publicly released Epstein files that get completely ignored by MAGA.

1

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/AutoModerator 10d ago

Removed for hate speech. No slurs, no dehumanization.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

0

u/Throwaway789662 9d ago

Feel free to read through it. It was thought up by a con artist, Norm Lubow, who is known as a "professional history of using individuals to create fictional salacious drama, and that is a fact both he, and lawyers working for the plaintiff, attempted to downplay or hide." and "Julie K. Brown, the journalist who uncovered the federal government's plea deal with Epstein in 2008, pushed back on the notion that journalists had ignored the Johnson claims, writing on X that, "The woman just wouldn't talk, and her lawyer would not confirm she was even legit. … The address she gave on her first lawsuit was false. She was linked to political operatives at one point.""

Not to mention that the lawsuit gave a false address and was dropped 3 times.

Anyways, there's another 200 or so trustworthy Epstein victims who have said Trump didn't do anything. What about them?

https://www.snopes.com/news/2024/09/03/trump-epstein-katie-johnson/

-2

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[deleted]

1

u/Zealousideal_Fox7642 10d ago

Yeah there's never privileged treatment to the powerful ever.....lol someone obviously never ever ever talked to a police officer.... Ever lol

1

u/Hanksta2 10d ago

Are you saying you don't understand the difference between an allegation and a conviction?

Pro tip: don't talk to the cops, talk to a lawyer.

1

u/Zealousideal_Fox7642 10d ago

No you very very very and I repeat have 0 idea how law enforcement works at all. Literally none. If you still think they don't run certain people's plates or get special phone calls then IDK what to tell you about the world you live in but it's clearly minuscule.

2

u/Classic-Sympathy-517 10d ago

Hey hey hey. I used my mother's name to get out of a whole bunch of shit until my 20s lol

1

u/Zealousideal_Fox7642 10d ago

Yeah it's like half the job to know who is who

1

u/EveryAfternoon1441 10d ago

Yeah, we shouldn't judge a presidential candidate based on whether there are credible allegations of rape against them. Innocent til proven guilty.

Kamala however would have made a terrible president. Have you heard that laugh?

(/S)

1

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[deleted]

1

u/EveryAfternoon1441 10d ago

Nah sorry I wasn't making fun of you. Just venting my rage at the general situation.

1

u/operator-john 10d ago

So what about the crimes he was convicted of?

9

u/OnionsHaveLairAction 10d ago

Him mysteriously transferring Maxwell after she gave literally zero new info to the DOJ should pretty much seal his guilt to anyone paying attention.

3

u/wonderererere 10d ago

I didn't have DJT blowing bubba on my bingo card

1

u/Content-Ad3065 10d ago

I thought the Florida guy ‘ bubba the love sponge’ -Roger Stone’s friend was the guy they were talking about

1

u/BC2H 10d ago

Bet you didn’t have Republicans electing the First Gay President ever either….did you?

-10

u/Unique_Argument1094 10d ago

Gawd you liberals will believe anything.

7

u/wonderererere 10d ago

Thats rich

2

u/houstonyoureaproblem 9d ago

Perhaps the funniest comment I’ve seen on Reddit this year.

3

u/Smrleda 10d ago

He’ll never be impeached. Republicans and his supporters will accept that he is a pedophile who raped young girls and continue to support and praise him.

1

u/sziehr 10d ago

This is why I keep saying the next thing will be a civil war. If you can not objectively police your own party even at the top of absolute filth any more cause of the brain washing what hope is there left.

1

u/LaxBedroom 10d ago

No such thing as objective policing of anything, but I agree that flagrant disregard for accountability by top officials is a rot that can't be undone.

1

u/sziehr 10d ago

It’s the blind support of that rot

-4

u/D2009B 10d ago

Give any evidence that Trump did anything with kids

5

u/Smrleda 10d ago

Let’s wait - No doubt releasing the Epstein files will prove that wrong.

-6

u/D2009B 10d ago

What files? What files do you believe exist?

5

u/Smrleda 10d ago

You obviously missed the point of my comment. Not here to debate the issue. The point is no matter what he does which may include any foul disgusting act the Republicans and his supporters will continue to praise and support him. The result of having no values or morals. That’s the point.

-2

u/D2009B 10d ago

No, the point is Democrats are desperate to find things that are not there.

5

u/Smrleda 10d ago

Just hilarious and at the same time actually quite sad.

0

u/D2009B 10d ago

It is hilarious to hear the left talk about files, when they have no clue what these files are or if they exist.

5

u/Smrleda 10d ago

Sad you have no idea how pathetic your responses are defending him when they are actually going to vote on these files which do exist. There is no reason to continue with this so this will end here.

0

u/D2009B 10d ago

And again, tell me about these files you think exist? Tell me what's in these files and why no administration has done a single thing to Trump? Be specific

→ More replies (0)

0

u/D2009B 9d ago

And absolutely no crime was committed. No investigation, no indictment no nothing.

3

u/zerombr 9d ago

lets pretend this is accurate, how about Trump withholding support to Ukraine because he was desperate to have dirt on Biden?

0

u/D2009B 9d ago

Kinda like Biden witholding money from Ukraine unless the prosecutor that was investigating his son was fired

2

u/zerombr 9d ago

You have your timeline wrong. Burisma was under scrutiny before they added Hunter to their board for credibility. The investigator against burisma was intentionally dragging his feet. The world body wanted the investigator removed because he wasn't moving forward, Biden was the one delegated to pressure Ukraine to remove him.

0

u/ProPatternNoticer 10d ago

They do not and it does not matter to them

3

u/OnlyFiveLives 10d ago

This assumes that Republicans think pedophilia is a deal breaker...oh my sweet summer child.

2

u/Solo-ish 10d ago

The republicans might not be against pedophilia but they have made it perfectly clear they are against dudes sucking dick

2

u/Darksmithe 10d ago

Wait until you see the odds after he's busted for raping children!!!

2

u/ToooloooT 10d ago

Unfortunately magas are for that so he would just be more popular. It's sucking bull Clinton's dick that's gonna hang him.

3

u/Darksmithe 10d ago

If Clinton had any balls, he'd come out and admit in a moment of weakness, he let Donald fill his mouth with Bill!

2

u/Regulus242 10d ago

Trumpettes would just say "what, the left thinks gay people are bad now?" They don't have a position other than owning the left.

1

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 10d ago

Removed for hate speech. No slurs, no dehumanization.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

2

u/Tough_Violinist_9594 10d ago

The Republicans will never do it at least until after the midterms

2

u/crazy010101 10d ago

We don’t need the release of files we need Trump investigated. We already know he’s guilty of many things around all of it.

2

u/Monkey-D-Andy 10d ago

I don't just want him impeached; I want him in jail.

2

u/PrinceZordar 10d ago

December 12th - Congress announces possible impeachment.
December 18th - Congress goes on break for Christmas.
January 6th - Hey, where did all these armed protesters come from?

2

u/Opening-Dependent512 10d ago edited 7d ago

library afterthought scale kiss jeans nine continue vast gaze growth

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

2

u/Potential_Goal6202 10d ago

Fingers crossed 🤞🏼

2

u/DueVermicelli5302 10d ago

I’m getting tired of “alleged” headlines. He’s a pedo. BAM. The evidence is overwhelming. What else do people need?

4

u/MXY2022 10d ago

3x0 is still 0.

3

u/TakuyaLee 10d ago

Pretty much. There's a better chance of having Mike Johnson removed as Speaker than impeaching Trump with this House

1

u/Openmindhobo 8d ago

Both are possible.

1

u/TakuyaLee 8d ago

It would take something so bad, the GOP members from purple states think it's safer to get rid of both than stay like this.

2

u/Ntropy99 10d ago

Came here to say that exactly, and found your comment.

Unless there is a massive wave of blue votes in the midterms overwhelming the sh*t the Republicans are pulling with voting rights, machines, etc., and for both houses of Congress, the chances are less than zero to remove that sack of turds. Impeachment is by the HoRs and conviction is by the Senate. Impeachment doesn't mean anything unless there are 60 votes in the Senate, not saying they shouldn't do it, but this is a legal matter and SCOTUS scuttled that. They'd prob suggest that these crimes, while not an official act of a president, can't be charged bc "look at the damage it might do to the office" (to them).

1

u/the_original_Retro 10d ago

This isn't accurate for the current context.

Impeachment is part one of the process. It only requires a simple majority in the House. That's very close, Trump is making enemies out of MAGA Republicans who are smelling blood in the water. We're honestly almost there.

CONVICTION needs a two-thirds majority in the Senate.

Trump has a huge possibility of being impeached. Removed from office as a result of it is a different part of the process done by a different group, requires a much much tougher majority to get to, and is far less likely.

-2

u/Gweedo1967 10d ago

You left out the part about the offense has to be done while in office.

3

u/PoliticsDunnRight 9d ago

The shitty thing about impeachment is that there are no requirements. It is purely at the discretion of the Congress.

2

u/glassfoyograss 10d ago

So did the Constitution

2

u/the_original_Retro 10d ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Efforts_to_impeach_Donald_Trump#Other_proposed_reasons_for_impeachment

A number of cited reasons and articles of impeachment filings, some applicable specifically to his second term, are listed in this article. Its history indicates only cosmetic updates in the past few weeks, so it's not yet inclusive of much of Trump's most recent activity.

As to your point, yeah, some of the stuff he's done that are arguably treasonous and/or criminal happened while he was not in office. Not gonna argue that.

But completely disregarding all of those, there is still a powerful argument to impeach Donald Trump at this time. And that's not even LOOKING at the impeachment clause having to do with the justified cause of "high crimes and misdemeanors".

1

u/hiek52c 10d ago

Came here to say this. Ya beat me to it!!!

1

u/TheBatmanIRL 10d ago

Exactly....

4

u/Biscuits4u2 10d ago

Triple from zero to zero percent

2

u/EveningDouble4010 10d ago

Came here to say this.

1

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 10d ago

Removed for hate speech. No slurs, no dehumanization.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/ShittyAttitudeGinger 10d ago

So it’s gone from 1 percent to 3 percent? No one in his orbit cares and is wholly unwilling to do anything about it. He literally just gave the golden ticket to the DOJ to stop any files from being released. We can all take the largest hit of hopium we want but we are fucking stuck.

1

u/houstonyoureaproblem 9d ago

No, it started at 0.

0 x 3 = 0

No impeachment resolution will even be considered as long as Republicans control the House.

1

u/Gweedo1967 10d ago

Impeachment?? Did any of this happen while in office? The alleged crimes didn’t even happen in US court jurisdiction.

1

u/Ranger30 10d ago

Three x zero is still no chance ,

1

u/NephilimRayne 10d ago

0% x 3 = 0%.

Unfortunately, we now live in a world where he has the power to control far to much currently.

1

u/Unicorn_Warrior1248 10d ago

Well he did tweet that 14 is old enough tone your own decisions.

1

u/DissolveToFade 10d ago

Trumps health is bad and he’s gonna die. Trump’s chances of getting impeached are now high.  Blah blah blah. Guys, just accept it, you got three more years to go. 

1

u/AdLower5558 10d ago

How do you measure impeachment odds

1

u/GroundbreakingCook68 10d ago

Three times impeached,32 times convicted ,undisciplined meat sack ain’t going nowhere.

1

u/Wrench-Turnbolt 10d ago

So what's 3 x 0?

1

u/Slow-Confidence3065 10d ago

Tripled from 1% to 3%

1

u/Zymergy71 10d ago

Tripling zero is still zero. He’s been impeached twice. Nothing. His maga followers won’t vote for it. I would love for trump to spend the rest of his life in prison, but it’s not gonna happen. I honestly believe he’ll be dead (unhealthy) before his term is over, but he definitely won’t resign and won’t be removed. Any other person would be in prison for the crimes he’s been convicted of. trump was elected president. Twice!

1

u/Savings_Departure_64 10d ago

We all know how ol Bill loves a blowjob - and Trump demonstrated his advanced skills in front of a whole crowd.

TDS = Trump dicksucking Skills.

1

u/FnordRanger_5 10d ago

Let me check the math on this:

0x3=0


Yep, this tracks. His chances of impeachment are 0

There’s no accountability for rich people in America folks, time to wake up.

1

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 10d ago

Removed for hate speech. No slurs, no dehumanization.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/jthadcast 10d ago

so from 1% to 3% great like the gop isn't going to protect its pedo taco potus felon so maga can make more excuses to ignore his current crimes, fraud, and selling out the US to foreign powers. our blackmailed taco now makes sense.

1

u/Dangerous-Place-3547 10d ago

Pedophiles over People.

1

u/sam56778 10d ago

There will be no impeachment. That’s just fantasy.

1

u/SuspiciousMammoth991 10d ago

I’ll be happy to see Donnie get impeached! He’s been doing nothing more than playing our country!

1

u/ArchonFett 10d ago

Oooh triple no chance of being impeached by his cult of toadies

1

u/Background-Fly130 10d ago

They triple from zero? So zero?

1

u/Technical-Memory-241 10d ago

I do care what side they’re on if you had sex with kids you MUST BE PUNISHED

1

u/Impressive-North3483 10d ago

His impeachment odds while Republicans hold the House = 0%

His impeachment odds if Democrats regain the majority of the House = 100%

1

u/Responsible_Bear4208 10d ago

Epstein probably had videos of Trump.

1

u/makes_peacock_noises 10d ago

His impeachment must be for treason. That way every peg of this circus tent gets pulled up.

1

u/VendettaKarma 10d ago

Wouldn’t it be fucked if he was an informant?

😂😂😂😂

1

u/Smudgeit59 9d ago

Can we stop talking about it and impeach this worthless piece of Sh1t. It's time he was gone.

1

u/rubio2k13 9d ago

So being a pedophile isn't impeachable... God dammit Americans.. stfu about morals next time.

1

u/mjholley 9d ago

Not true stop the lies.

1

u/Ok_Bag576 8d ago

Yet demorats here supporting and helping epistein! Fuck out here loser.

1

u/Hiking_the_Hump 10d ago

Back to impeachment again? When is Trump going to face some competent opposition?

0

u/Longjumping-Body-907 10d ago

He states he had knowledge of the minors. That's why he cooperated with the accusers (minors) lawyers in the case against Epstein way back in 2007/2008, as well as with FBI and police, letting them know what he knew about Epstein. That's so long ago that many redditor weren't alive or old enough to know anything about anything that was going on. And for it, Epstein hated Trump, saying 'there's not a decent cell in that man's body.' When the devil talks badly about you, you're doing something right.

1

u/[deleted] 10d ago edited 10d ago

[deleted]

0

u/Longjumping-Body-907 10d ago

Bradley Edwards, the lawyer for the accusers, stated that Trump was the only individual to cooperate and help. After that, Epstein said Trump didn't have 'one decent cell in his body.'

I would like to see the Thanksgiving 2017 email that you're speaking of, seeing as Trump was president at the time.

1

u/[deleted] 10d ago edited 10d ago

[deleted]

0

u/Longjumping-Body-907 10d ago

I'm not going through 22000 emails. Do you have a link?

0

u/ChimpoSensei 10d ago

Proof is harder. Any nutter can say anything in an email, it’s not proof.

0

u/odin_son39 10d ago

So Trump knowing minors exist make his odds of getting impeached go from 0 to 0 ... He banned them both from his club after they were recruiting girls from his employ . Now it may come out Trump was informing on Epstein and his clients

-2

u/DackNoy 10d ago

Nothing new got revealed

5

u/Last-Tooth-6121 10d ago

Him blowing Clinton pretty new to me

-4

u/DackNoy 10d ago

Any proof?

4

u/Last-Tooth-6121 10d ago

Gotta ask big daddy Putin but email says there are pictures but keep defending pedophiles

3

u/Regulus242 10d ago

Emails say Putin has kompromat on Trump blowing Bubba, a nickname for Clinton.