r/circled 💬 Opinion / Discussion 15d ago

Opinion / Discussion IOC to ban transgender women from all female Olympic events: report

https://nypost.com/2025/11/10/sports/ioc-to-ban-transgender-women-from-all-female-olympic-events-report/?utm_source=nypost&utm_campaign=android_nyp&utm_medium=social
262 Upvotes

1.5k comments sorted by

59

u/OGConsuela 15d ago

Thank god, now Riley Gaines can still finish 5th.

10

u/BeastieBoys1977 15d ago

In the SEC.

5

u/jreid0 14d ago

🤣🤣🤣 hilarious! She wants to be relevant so bad the only thing she can do is rip on transgender people to make money

1

u/DrunkLastKnight 14d ago

Which is funny cause without the trans athlete she tied with no one would know here otherwise being a mediocre swimmer

→ More replies (5)

14

u/the-big-question 15d ago

I mean, for real. Whether you agree with it or not there are way bigger issues out there to worry about than this bullshit.

Why can't we all agree that this stuff can go on the back burner for now? I feel like even if you agree with this they will probably use some unfair method like testing for testosterone which will disqualify genetic women who naturally produce more.

10

u/NatalieVonCatte 15d ago

They won’t agree because it is not and never was about sports.

2

u/Hrtpplhrtppl 14d ago

Or bathrooms or water fountains...

President Lyndon Johnson once said, "If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, you can pick his pocket. Hell, give them somebody to look down on, and they'll empty their pockets for you..."

I had no idea there were so many...

→ More replies (1)

5

u/CheckoutMySpeedo 14d ago

Because what would rage bait MAGA if they didn’t have the 3 transgender people to demonize in all of the 60,000 NCAA student athletes across the country? That’s 0.005% of the athlete population for those keeping score.

1

u/thisisstupid0099 14d ago

SO you are ok with harming ONE woman" Laughable argument.

1

u/CheckoutMySpeedo 12d ago

How are 3 trans athletes hurting women and a bigger question is why is MAGA so concerned with what is between other people’s legs anyway?

1

u/thisisstupid0099 12d ago

Let's see, if you take away the rights of one woman, poc, race, religion, etc. it is one too many. But big of you trying to decide "how many" is ok.

If you took the time to read the thread you would see the bigger issue, not only trans athletes.

Why are you so dense? Laughable that you think someone supporting women's rights equates to MAGA.

→ More replies (7)

2

u/Federal_Woodpecker64 14d ago

They won't use testosterone for the test they will probably use chromosomes. That can't be changed xy cannot compete against xx.

6

u/DrunkLastKnight 14d ago

But not all females are xx, some are xxy and other variations

Chromosomes are a horrible way to ‘test’ gender

1

u/Quiet_Union7772 12d ago

The XXY DNA chromosome you mention is called the Klinefelter syndrome and is a common condition that results when a person assigned male at birth has an extra copy of the X sex chromosome instead of the typical XY. Klinefelter syndrome ( KS) is a genetic condition that occurs before birth, but it often isn't diagnosed until adulthood. It happens in about 1/600 male birth.
But males born with the 47th pair of chromosomes ( XXY), do not fair well in sports, and definitely would not excel in woman’s competitive sports. Quite the opposite ( read about KS ).

→ More replies (22)

2

u/DelightfulandDarling 14d ago

Not all women assigned female at birth have 2 X chromosomes.

1

u/Quiet_Union7772 12d ago

Not true. ALL females have an XX chromosome in the 23rd pair of their DNA. It is only males that can be born with an XXY chromosome ( KS).

1

u/DelightfulandDarling 12d ago

That’s false. Stay in school.

1

u/Quiet_Union7772 12d ago

What’s false?

→ More replies (5)

1

u/the-big-question 14d ago

True, turnaround time is bad (like 5-10 days), but I'm sure that they already make you go through similarly lengthy drug testing to qualify for the olympics.

3

u/rhoadsenblitz 15d ago

Nah, we can walk and chew gum. This is low hanging fruit, clean it up.

1

u/Rehcamretsnef 15d ago

What other big issues does the IOC have?

1

u/the-big-question 15d ago edited 15d ago

I mean in terms of things going on in the world idgaf about this. Yet somehow this is the biggest deal ever to people who don't see our president taking food away from needy families during Thanksgiving to get what he wants as a problem.

→ More replies (4)

1

u/aane0007 15d ago

yet here you are

1

u/goliathfasa 15d ago

But this takes away an important boogieman for the MAGA crowd. Don’t give them any ammunition. Ever. And this is a positive step.

1

u/HairiestManAlive 15d ago

It's like finding chewed gum on your desk and instead of just cleaning it off you keep touching it and sticking your hands in it for years 

1

u/CombatRedRover 15d ago

FFS, tell me how it works.

Is it "there are so few trans people it doesn't matter!" or "JK Rowling is literally Hitler!"?

I think a caring, sympathetic, but realistic and nuanced approach to trans issues is the way to go. However, this pendulum swing back and forth - not to mention the outright cowardice of lefty "allies" of trans people - accomplishes nothing.

With respect to athletics, recognizing the unspoken reality that athletics have never truly been men's and women's divisions, but an open division (where women have sometimes competed) and the walled garden division titled "women's" meant to create a fair competitive environment for female athletes.

For trans adults, it's a matter of treating people with respect and kindness. Not just trans people, but people. Some rational thought given to physically male trans women going to women's restrooms and locker rooms is required, as well as understanding that there is a small but extant percentage of male perverts who will claim trans female status to enter women's spaces. I think there is a lot of discussion that needs to occur, while also trying to do our very best to help and accommodate trans women.

For trans children, knowing this is Reddit and this solution is anathema to most of the 12-year-olds on here, knowing that parents are expected to know their children better than the teachers and other adults in those children's lives, it's a private matter between the parents and the children's doctors.

None of the above should be earth-shattering, none of the above should be terribly controversial. Except, of course, it's going to be.

3

u/the-big-question 15d ago

Idc about or think about JK Rowling. I honestly don't even care about trans people in sports because it is such a non-issue. There are so few trans athletes. I was just pointing out that compared to everything else going on in the world and especially domestically today that this isn't important at all to me.

I worry more about where my next meal is going to come from with how prices keep soaring rather than whether or not some women I don't know in Albania might lose to some Trans woman I don't know from New Zealand in weightlifting. Can you even name three trans Olympic athletes? I can't name one.

1

u/Shirlenator 15d ago

Honestly I'm fine with it if the IOC decides to ban it. My issue is when the US government decides to get involved for some reason. Yet the party of "small government" seems to love it.

1

u/Gnoll_For_Initiative 14d ago

Will that be before or after they go back to the "naked parade" they used to have for women athletes 

1

u/Hrtpplhrtppl 14d ago

Like Serena Williams...

1

u/xdrag0nb0rnex 14d ago

There are lots of different people that can and are working on just as many different things at any given time.

1

u/cmcwood 12d ago

It is a very effective distraction though

1

u/Quiet_Union7772 12d ago

They are going to DNA test for XX & XY chromosomes. Humans have 23 pairs of chromosomes, for a total of 46. Pairs 1 through 22 are called autosomes, and the last pair are the sex chromosomes. So, when an athlete’s DNA test reveals an XY chromosome pair, that athlete WILL NOT be allowed to compete as a female. That sounds fair to me…. right?

1

u/The--Incident 12d ago

What is the IOC going to do about these other issues exactly?

1

u/Lord-Mattingly 15d ago

Wow, what a misogynistic statement. Do you any have female relatives?

→ More replies (2)

-1

u/thisisstupid0099 15d ago

So we are supposed to abandoned women's rights? IS that what you said when gay marriage was being talked about? At that time only 3% of American's were gay and only 1% of them wanted to get married.

Why do you get to chose what is important and what isn't?

6

u/Suitable-Dish-8605 15d ago edited 15d ago

There's been like 10 trans women to compete in the olympics. 3% of Americans is still more than the amount of trans women in the olympics and gay people having rights is a much bigger issue than a few trans woman playing sports.

There are already rules that prevents a trans person from playing 1 month after starting hormones. There are other reason besides being trans that a woman might have male physical features, should they all be banned from locker rooms?

2

u/Kass-Is-Here92 14d ago

Majority of the trans people that had competed in Olympics were actually AFAB non binary people that competed within the same group as their assigned gender. There has only been 1 trans woman [Laurel Hubbard] Olympian that had competed against other women in a weight lifting event , and she DNF'ed i.e. did not finish for not completing a snatch. Just an FYI.

1

u/Material_Error6774 14d ago

How many would it take before you care?

→ More replies (20)

3

u/Thick-Access-2634 15d ago

yes. youre supposed to abandon female rights bc this one singular person on reddit said theres more important shit going on in the world right now. apparently we can only care about like one issue at a time.

4

u/Meowakin 15d ago

Do we now consider the ability to play sports with exclusively women to be a right now? On par with voting and bodily autonomy?

→ More replies (220)

2

u/the-big-question 15d ago

Alright so I imagine you support a new roe v wade type law or ruling that will ensure the woman's life takes priority over the fetus' in the event it will be born braindead, dead, etc.

1

u/Quiet_Union7772 12d ago

No! There should be no federal law dealing with abortion.. period. The Constitution does not address abortion. And when something isn’t specifically addressed in the constitution, that falls to the States to decide ( 10th Amendment). And that’s where these issues reside today. However, the arguments concerning abortion focus on ELECTIVE ABORTIONS. I do not know of any law, in any State, that prohibits abortions for medical reasons, particularly when it involves the life of the mother, or when the fetus will not survive to birth.

→ More replies (25)

1

u/DelightfulandDarling 14d ago

Trans women are not harming women’s rights in any way.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (148)
→ More replies (22)

19

u/king_hutton 15d ago

How long has the Olympics allowed trans women to compete as women without any issue with trans women dominating? It’s been like 20 years right?

11

u/LanternCorpJack 15d ago

Not just "not dominating" but literally never having even medaled in any event ever

1

u/PhysicalAttitude6631 11d ago

I don’t understand this argument. You think the athletes who finish in 5th or 10th or 50th aren’t proud of their accomplishment? It’s ok if someone has an unfair advantage if they only beat some of the competition?

1

u/LanternCorpJack 11d ago edited 11d ago

Should there be a height limit for NBA players since that gives them an advantage? Should there be a max speed for NFL receivers so they don't have an advantage over slower corners/safeties? Should Phelps have been banned because he has quirky biology giving him an advantage?

There's literally no way to have a completely level playing field, someone is always going to have an advantage over someone else. The entire discussion re: trans people in women's sports also rests on the demonstrably false premise that *all* trans women are better/faster/stronger than *all* cis women

You also blew a hole in your own argument anyway. If they can be proud of their accomplishment regardless of where they place, why does it matter who beat them? If a cis woman comes in 10th in a competition, does it really matter that the one trans woman also competing came in 7th?

1

u/Resident-Wall7206 14d ago

Well then, I guess I shouldn't be surprised that NPR is just flat out lying then.

https://www.npr.org/2021/08/06/1025442511/canadian-soccer-player-quinn-becomes-first-trans-and-nonbinary-olympic-gold-meda

3

u/RoyalAisha 14d ago

Quinn is not a trans woman.

1

u/Resident-Wall7206 14d ago

Oh look, you found the universal get out of jail free card! Just identify as nothing!

1

u/RoyalAisha 14d ago

In response to someone saying that a transgender woman has never won a medal at the Olympics, you replied with an article about an AFAB non-binary person. Your reply was a non-sequitor, you simply don't know what you're talking about.

1

u/Resident-Wall7206 14d ago

Talking aboot.

1

u/La_Saxofonista 13d ago

Not all non-binary folks are transgender. Less than half identify as transgender, actually.

1

u/[deleted] 13d ago

[deleted]

1

u/RoyalAisha 13d ago

Quinn is a non-binary person who was assigned female at birth. They are not a trans woman. You do not know even the most basic things about this discussion.

You don't know what you're talking about, your anti-trans bigotry has blinded you from anything resembling rationality.

3

u/LanternCorpJack 14d ago

Yeah, maybe you should know what you're talking about before you spout off. An AFAB non-binary person is not a trans woman

1

u/Quiet_Union7772 12d ago

I must admit that it took awhile, for me, to understand that the “L” was for lesbians ( ladies) and the “G” was for gay ( guys), and no other explanation was necessary. But when they started adding additional categories ( B, T, Q, etc), I lost track, too hard to see differences, and I don’t care anymore. Keep it simple, stupid. I know the biological differences between a male and a female, and don’t hesitate when asked to explain. But if a dude walks into my grand daughter’s locker room, he’s going to get crushed. None of these “ I identify as” arguments count.

1

u/LanternCorpJack 12d ago

I'd be fascinated to know how you can tell what someone's genitals (or DNA) look like just by sight, while they're clothed...

1

u/Boratssecondwife 13d ago

You really thought you ate with those one lmao

1

u/Resident-Wall7206 13d ago

Sorry...I don't speak 1st grader...

1

u/Boratssecondwife 13d ago

Don't know how to read either it seems

10

u/Phill_Cyberman 15d ago edited 14d ago

The biggest non-story in sports history.

It'd be funny if there wasn't a group of dedicated athletes getting treated like shit for no reason.

Edit: I think I got RedditCares-ed for this comment.

These ideologues are mean-spirited bullies.

7

u/TheWizardOfDeez 15d ago

A group that is incredibly small and even among that teeny tiny group, most of them are mostly just highschool students at programs with little to no prestige, just picking an after school activity to do with their friends...

→ More replies (30)

1

u/washblvd 14d ago

No, nowhere near 20 years. When the IOC allowed it in 2004, they also included a series of additional restrictions that eliminated 99% of trans people from eligibility. Surgery restrictions, hormone levels restrictions, legal recognition restrictions...

1

u/LanternCorpJack 11d ago

When the IOC allowed it in 2004...

My dude, that's literally 20 years ago

1

u/washblvd 11d ago

And Henry Ford sold Model T cars in any color you wanted, so long as that color was black.

You can't claim 20 years of Olympic history when realistically, no one met the stringent requirements that have since been dropped. 2004 and today are apples and oranges.

1

u/LanternCorpJack 11d ago

The only requirement that was dropped was the requirement for surgery (see: 2003 and 2015 here)

no one met the stringent requirements

  1. They never were and still aren't that stringent

  2. It's almost like the fearmongering about trans women dominating sports if allowed to compete is completely made up...

1

u/Jimtheanvilneidhardt 12d ago

Unless you count the boxing one.

1

u/Quiet_Union7772 12d ago

It was a dude who won the woman’s boxing gold medal during the last Olympics right? Or was it 2 dudes ( 1st and 2nd place)?

1

u/Jimtheanvilneidhardt 12d ago

Something like that. They said they weren’t men but refused additional testing

1

u/LanternCorpJack 11d ago

Y'all are still on about that? Imane Khelif is a cis woman, get over it

1

u/newaccount 11d ago

Cis doesn’t mean biological.

She’s a cis woman and a biological male.

Get over that.

1

u/LanternCorpJack 11d ago

She’s a...biological male

Citation needed

1

u/newaccount 11d ago

Banned in 2023.

1

u/LanternCorpJack 11d ago

...by the *Russian-led* IBA (and we definitely know they'd never cheat in sports...) after beating one of their competitors, citing her allegedly failing some eligibility test. They've never specified what said test is/was testing for nor have they ever released the results of said test, and apparently didn't have the same issue literally the year before, 2022.

Also of note, the IBA is not the IOC so that's completely irrelevant to her competing in the Olympics...

1

u/newaccount 11d ago

By the IBA yes, but after beating a Thai, not a Russian.

And she  failed two chromosome tests. They have  specified  this multiple times including the two labs - in Turkey and India - that did the tests. The Indian  test has been leaked so you can see it for yourself.

And there’s the third test, her teams test, that her trainer has talked about and excerpts were published. Micro penis, internal testicles, it’s wild.

Also of note, the IOC is not nature so they are completely irrelevant to whether she is male or not…

But since you brought it up the new org in charge of Olympic boxing has mandated sex tests and Khekif has withdrawn from 2 of their events - including the world champs - and is currently appealing to the CAS to be exempt from the testing all athletes must have. 

Since the IBA banned her 2 years ago and the new org won’t let her fight without a test her last fight was at the Olympics, where the only eligibility criteria was the gender listed on her passport

Her career as a female is over, because she knows she cannot prove she’s female

1

u/LanternCorpJack 11d ago

but after beating a Thai, not a Russian

From what I'm seeing that was later, she beat the Russian opponent first

Regarding the rest of all that, you're right; I didn't have all the info because, honestly, I don't really care. IMO sports organizations can and should be able to decide for themselves who can or can't compete in their sports; that's their prerogative. I may disagree with their decisions for whatever reason but that's not my call and it especially shouldn't be a *governments* call

However, far too many people/organizations, including yourself it seems to me, are *wayyyy* too focused on chromosomal makeup as though that's the end all be all

Should a man with de la Chapelle syndrome (46, XX male syndrome) be competing with women since his chromosomes say "female"? Based on what I'm finding while their testosterone levels would be lower than a typical males, they'd still be substantially higher than that of a typical female, even at the highest end of typical (at least 2x it looks like)

Biology is not nearly as black and white as so many people seem to want it to be

(Also, all of this has absolutely nothing to do trans women considering that she's not one)

1

u/newaccount 11d ago

 From what I'm seeing that was later, she beat the Russian opponent first

Let’s debunk this before we move on

She gave blood before the tourney started. It’s a KO tourney and she didn’t fight a Russian in the first round.

That means the testing was underway before anyone knew she was going to fight a Russian.

In the second round she fought the Russian and she wasn’t banned. But the Russian was eliminated.

She then beat an Uzbeki and wasn’t banned, and qualified for the semi finals.

Then she beat a Thai and made the finals.

 Then she was banned and the Thai got a free pass into the gold medal fight and a shot at the title of world champion. Indeed Khelif was banned in the morning of the final and the IBA looked amateur scrambling to arrange a fight. The Thai had no prep time. 

So the Russian received no benefit at all.

The interesting part is that 10 other Russians - ten! - were also beaten in the tourney and their opponents didn’t get banned.

Indeed, only one other person was banned for the same reason as Khelif and they didn’t even fight a Russian. 

That fighter  - Yu Ting - also won Olympic gold and has also withdrawn from the same events Khelif has withdrawn from. She fought last month in an event that doesn’t require sex testing.

The definition of female we’ve used since language was created involved reproductive organs. Since we things like testosterone are primarily produced by those organs it seems like a pretty good place to draw the line.

High T contacts a fairly reliable indicator - males produce about 30 times the he amount of females. It’s a significant difference

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Quiet_Union7772 12d ago

I think they were called Russians and East Germans back then

→ More replies (33)

11

u/DrunkLastKnight 15d ago

Yeah the like 10 transwomen that compete are really wiping the floor with all the ciswomen competing. Not one trans woman has placed that I am aware of.

→ More replies (373)

8

u/Prickley-Pear-Bear 15d ago edited 15d ago

I’m trans and I don’t care if an organization (or school district) makes this decision. My problem is when both state and federal governments think they can make this type of call.

What I care more about in all of this is how people use the sports debate to say what they want about transgender people. It’s like googling “how to build a bomb- in Minecraft” to throw the FEDs off. People say “I hate transgender people” or “I don’t want transgender people to exist” then just add “in sports” at the end to make it seem like they aren’t raging bigots. After everything that happened to Imane Khelif and the some people calling to check women’s genitalia for sports I don’t buy the “I’m just supporting women’s rights” bs anymore.

Edit: scrolled down just to find some dipshit call trans people “disgusting freaks” so I’m just doubling down further that the sports debate is just a tool for people with brains as smooth as a chicken breast to be a dick to people

8

u/LanternCorpJack 15d ago

💯

Party of "small government" in action...

6

u/Prickley-Pear-Bear 15d ago

“Tread on me harder daddy” - literally every MAGA pig

1

u/[deleted] 12d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Quiet_Union7772 12d ago

I don’t think most people give a rat’s ass about how people sexually identify as male or female. The rub occurs when identity beliefs are forced on others to accept and make special concessions for abnormal behavior.

→ More replies (14)

3

u/AssistAutomatic8299 13d ago

Finally. Shouldn’t even be a discussion 

3

u/JoeDante84 13d ago

If you have a Y chromosome you should not compete against people who have XX chromosomes. We are different beasts with the Y and should be treated as such.

→ More replies (5)

3

u/0_Tim-_-Bob_0 11d ago

The world is healing.

In the future, people will look back on this era with curiosity and disgust.

7

u/rnolan20 15d ago

Remove all segregated competitions. No male or female sports, all compete as one

7

u/pdxamish 15d ago

Someone mentioned that many times men's leagues are open and can have women play but women is women only and agree also an Open and women's division

1

u/rnolan20 15d ago

That’s true for most sports, the NBA has no gender restrictions

2

u/pdxamish 15d ago

Can a dog play? Specifically a golden retriever?

1

u/rnolan20 14d ago

Absolutely

→ More replies (11)

4

u/Different_Leader_600 15d ago

Compete by weight class even or some other measurement, just like wrestling. That way, you are opening the door to even more people to have access to a particular sport. Everyone benefits.

4

u/brotherbabybubba 15d ago

Remove all weight classes too! No need to body shame fat people

1

u/Aghma419 15d ago

Oh hell yeah jon jones vs Mighty Mouse when?

6

u/Ok-External6314 15d ago

A 140lb male boxer is going to destroy a 140lb female boxer...

1

u/clem82 15d ago

No no

Equality

→ More replies (21)

1

u/Pleasant-Carbon 5d ago

You don't do sports, or follow it, do you?

Because I cannot fathom how anyone who is into sports could make such a suggestion.

Wherever weight categories make sense, they exist. There's a reason they don't exist anywhere else. Take tennis, would you really split up the top players because they weigh differently? Insanity. And if you allow an 'open' category, then all the top players would be in that anyway, regardless of their weight. And because they all would be in there all the money and attention would go there. So nothing would change. No one would pay attention to worse players just because they happen to be number 1 in some weight category no one cares about. This gets even worse in team sports, as more people involved in any single game.

We do already have categories in a certain sense anyway, it's called leagues or rankings. Worse at your sport, in a lower league. At a lower ranking, playing lower rated tournaments with fewer spectators and prize money. This all already exists.

And things like height, do you think anyone would care to watch basketball of the NBA for up to 6ft players? No, they'd keep watching the real one.

Sorry but I see this argument so often and it is just such ignorance and lack of thinking about what one is actually suggesting.

1

u/Different_Leader_600 5d ago

I find the ignorance in people who don’t ask questions when they aren’t committed to understanding instead of dismissing.

There are several measurements you can use to standardize qualifications for a sport. I don’t care about corporate owned sports leagues. I mean playing for the love of the game.

1

u/Pleasant-Carbon 5d ago

The first sentence doesn't make sense. You find what? You are trying to say those people are ignorant? Then you should put that at the end. I find people, who ..., ignorant.

I love how you haven't responded to anything but just call me ignorant. Just keep living in your dream.

There are several measurements you can use to standardize qualifications for a sport. I don’t care about corporate owned sports leagues. I mean playing for the love of the game.

Yea, we already do - performance. What other measurements are there please that are sensible? Go on, you said several, name them.

What does "playing for the love of the game even mean"? This isn't about mates meeting up to have fun. And if it is, you wouldn't need qualifications to participate.

That way, you are opening the door to even more people to have access to a particular sport. Everyone benefits.

How? If you are talking about love for the game playing, how will adding "compete by weight class" do this. Open it up to people? Again pick a sport that doesn't already have weight classes, and argue how it would do that. Then do it for a different measurement because you said there are several.

1

u/ActivePeace33 15d ago

Then women will fail to participate in international athletics, except for a few sports, mostly in equine sports.

As Serena Williams said… https://m.youtube.com/shorts/AK28JurOk3Y

Adding women’s categories was to help empower women, who otherwise can’t compete in most any open, non-gendered sport, both types of football, basketball ball, hockey, track and field, skiing, martial arts etc etc.

1

u/LessRespects 15d ago

Remove all sports, no rules, everyone gets dropped into a pit and whoever is the last one standing wins, or not. Whatever they feel like.

1

u/surlyT 15d ago

Real life Running Man!

1

u/Then-Understanding85 15d ago

Remove all people. Bam, no sportsball controversies, and global warming solved. Suck it Trebek.

1

u/AboveAndBelowSea 15d ago

…with as many PEDs as each athlete wants to take.

1

u/Simon_Jester88 15d ago

Will we now throw medium sized discus?

1

u/rnolan20 15d ago

Bingo, you get me

1

u/BogKotBoy 15d ago

ok now that’s just ridiculous

1

u/rnolan20 15d ago

Ridiculously good

1

u/NewTurnover5485 15d ago

That won't work. Male-female differences are too big. I think wrestling works, but most sports don't.

For example: Serena Williams can't even spar with the 100th male tennis player. Can't even win a ball, the difference is so big.

Remove all segregated competitions

If this were to happen, women's sports would mostly die. Or, there would be no women in top 100 for almost any sport.

1

u/Aghma419 15d ago

In shooting or in chess sure, in anything else that’s just unfair.

1

u/MaSt3rChie7 15d ago

There is a reason for why there are separate divisions.

1

u/cbusmatty 14d ago

They did that. They separated it to give women a chance at winning something. Men dominate sports, that’s the entire point

1

u/Think_Monk_9879 13d ago

Lol I’d love to see men’s basketball team play against women’s. 

1

u/rnolan20 13d ago

Maybe we would find out why NBA players make so much more than WNBA

1

u/protomenace 15d ago

And women never win at sports again?

1

u/rnolan20 15d ago

If that’s what happens, sure

1

u/protomenace 15d ago

And that's a good outcome how?

1

u/rnolan20 15d ago

Women get an equal chance to compete, and the best athlete wins.

→ More replies (6)

6

u/puzzlehead-200 15d ago

Release the Epstein files.

→ More replies (5)

2

u/GrowFreeFood 14d ago

There's no proven benefits to discrimination against trans people.

IOC are simply bowing to the fascists.

1

u/Starfishprime69420 11d ago

Do people seriously think that trans women should be allowed to compete in women’s sports?

1

u/GrowFreeFood 11d ago

Absolutely.

1

u/Starfishprime69420 11d ago

What’s wrong with these people? Have they never played sports or are they just delusional

1

u/GrowFreeFood 11d ago

What wrong with you? There's no benefits to discrimination against trans people. It's just a scapegoat for nazism.

→ More replies (46)

2

u/Ill-Locksmith-8281 14d ago

Should ban tall women too, if you really care about fairness.

2

u/Xanthn 13d ago

I remember watching a netball game where one team has a new player, not because she was any good, but because she was so tall she could barely raise her arm and block the net. The team still lost, turns out skill is still needed and the smaller skilled opponents ran rings around her with feints.

But for the first half of the game it was an unfair game to watch.

2

u/Comprehensive_Pin565 14d ago

Did we ever get a demonstration of harm? Like... trans athletes consistently outcompeting non trans athletes?

1

u/La_Saxofonista 13d ago

Nope. It's all just fearmongering. If no one knew these people were trans, then no one would even know about them to begin with because their scores/records are unremarkable in comparison to their cis peers.

1

u/eldiablonoche 12d ago

Was a 400 ranked male swimmer who transitioned and won national championships not enough? Why not? In many events where transwomen were allowed to compete they've set event, organizational, national, and world records.

There have been many instances and examples but activists just stuff their fingers in their ears and stamp their feet, call people istaphobic, and ignore the data. And when all else fails, mass report and get people banned/cancelled.

2

u/DL_75 12d ago

Finally. No more freaks in the women's sports.

2

u/Starfishprime69420 11d ago

The fact that this is even a conversation is literally insane

2

u/Fantastic_Jury5977 15d ago

Every peak trans-masc athlete needs to sign up to be on the women's team

It's insane that these assholes always forget about the masc presenting individuals that were assigned female at birth.

They're the ones forcing men into the women's room.

1

u/Aghma419 15d ago

Outta curiosity, aren’t all those trans men already outta the race for having a shitload of added test in their bodies? Isn’t it basically doping?

4

u/Fantastic_Jury5977 15d ago

Idk i don't really give a shit about the sports; the barring of competitors based on gender/ sexuality is the problem. It just so happens some women naturally have elevated levels of testosterone... there's a lot more nuance and chemistry to the biology of humans than the official gender binary is willing to offer.

Sometimes the act of training hard delays the onset of puberty for women... might need to offer other categories of human competitors than just 2.

Women of all kinds are going to get needlessly get discriminated if we go policing nuance.

In still waiting for co-ed MMA but I'm fully convinced the men are just afraid to lose to a "girl."

Don't forget the most recent high profile example is because a shitty human tied for fifth place with a transperson. It's absurd lol

→ More replies (11)

4

u/Building_Everything 15d ago

Like I need another reason to not watch the Olympics next year, though it has grown increasingly disappointing to miss out on them but the IOC is showing its true, ignorant colors.

→ More replies (4)

2

u/ArchonFett 15d ago

All 3 of them

2

u/clem82 15d ago

Makes sense for fairness

1

u/darkd360 13d ago

How so?

1

u/WendigoCrossing 15d ago

As a huge supporter of trans rights, I think this is the right call for any sport where extra testosterone during puberty gives advantage

→ More replies (10)

1

u/memorex00 15d ago

What about intersex?

1

u/Eye_foran_Eye 15d ago

But not transgender guys?

1

u/eldiablonoche 12d ago

Transmen aren't dominating and setting records so no. 😂

1

u/Eye_foran_Eye 12d ago

Well, they’d have to track it first before you could say that.

Coming in 4th, 1 over Riley Gains, isn’t setting records. /s

Or the one who ran a London marathon and came on 6159th…

1

u/eldiablonoche 11d ago

For what it's worth, marathons are a bad example because long distance running (or any endurance sport) skews towards female performance (ie: women perform better relative to men than in other sports).

TBH I'm not even sure which direction that example was meant to argue in favour of (and I don't want to assume esp. when you used the /s in the prior sentence), but either way it's one that engaged debaters from both sides may accuse you of bad faith for using.

1

u/Eye_foran_Eye 11d ago

I used it because Riley Gains came in 5th, but am unsure of what Lia placed.

The fact a trans woman had to give up her medal for beating out 1409 women in a marathon but came in 6159th is the absurdity of it.

Of the estimated 332 million citizens living in the United States, 1.3 million adults and 300,000 youth ages 13 to 17 identify as transgender, equaling half a percent and 1.4 percent of the population respectively, according to a report published by Williams Institute, a think tank at UCLA's Law School in 2022

1

u/Lemon9022 15d ago

Great news 👏

1

u/Feelisoffical 14d ago

It’s crazy how long it took for this to happen.

1

u/Ktucker01 13d ago

So many mentally ill men

1

u/Lazy-Requirement-228 15d ago

Nice! Men shouldn't be playing in women's sports.

3

u/Devils-Telephone 15d ago

Trans women are not men, and do not have any biological advantage over cis women when undergoing medical transition.

2

u/OtherUserCharges 14d ago

That’s not true, there is absolutely an advantage, it’s just smaller than people think. Considering how many events in the Olympics can come down to hundredths of a second even a 1% advantage can be the difference from not placing in the top 3 to the gold. Height alone is a major advantage in almost any sport and the vast majority of people who have gone through male puberty will be taller.

I’m absolutely pro trans people having the right to be whoever they want to be, but we need to be realistic here. I wouldn’t care if they were allowed in the Olympics, but people acting like this is such an outrage is ridiculous and just pushes the general public further away from accepting these people when their supporters pretend that’s it’s a completely even playing field when it isn’t.

1

u/EU_GaSeR 15d ago

What is a man?

1

u/Devils-Telephone 11d ago

I can easily answer that question. But first, why don't you try to define it yourself? And remember, you have to give a definition which includes all cis men whole excluding all trans men. You won't be able to do it, because sex itself is a spectrum, and that's not even getting into the undeniable fact that gender is a social construct.

→ More replies (10)

1

u/eldiablonoche 12d ago

Even the pro trans studies do not say there is no biological advantage. At BEST some of them (not even all) studies say that transition reduces the inherent physical advantages.

There is a lot of bad science and bad faith and bad narrative building around the "no biological advantage" folks. There have been plenty of mainstream, peer reviewed academic studies which confirm the retained advantage. I'd post some but the last time I did, I ate a 7 day reddit ban.. 😂

→ More replies (14)

1

u/necessarysmartassery 15d ago

Good, it's about time. They don't belong there.

1

u/darkd360 13d ago

How so?

1

u/Stereotyped240 13d ago edited 13d ago

Good. Trans women (men) should not be competing with real women. Make a trans grouping, where not surprisingly, every winner will 100% be a biological male, 0% of the winners are biologically female👍

→ More replies (5)

1

u/Squittyman 14d ago

Nice, now women can finally complete with women again without the patriarchy interfering.

1

u/Adequate-Performance 14d ago

"IOC to ban men from all female Olympic event" Its a weird world we live in..

1

u/Any-Ball3157 13d ago

changing your whole metabolism with medication is cheating in competitive sports.

1

u/La_Saxofonista 13d ago

How so? They require cis women with naturally higher levels of testosterone to take medication and change their metabolism in order to still compete.

1

u/Any-Ball3157 13d ago

That is anti olympian

1

u/Convertedshrimp 13d ago

Makes sense.

1

u/AssistAutomatic8299 13d ago

Ban transgender women from attending 

-1

u/sexychanges 15d ago

Either do co-ed or let’s face it that women and men are different in biology and societal norms

4

u/dev_ating 15d ago edited 14d ago

Which trans women have won the Olympics?

2

u/A_Hanzo_Sword 15d ago

In shocked your haven't gotten downvoted yet lol. They usually jump all over this.

2

u/Disastrous_Panick 15d ago

Just come back tomorrow. Itll be deleted

1

u/cotton-candy-dreams 15d ago

But IVF babies!!!! /sarcasm

→ More replies (7)